The best you can do for $60B in tokens is a half-baked mobile app.

And they also got rid of their clueful employees while pivoting to... whatever the hell they're doing now.

And why would they spend money on AI that doesn't increase ad sales anyways?

Vonnegut had a fun take on what going for "equality of outcome" vs "equality of opportunity" could end up looking like (though his was, of course, not simply "economic" in nature).

Oh man... that's the George Bush company. They still do the fish oil thing. But what I want to know is why they pivoted from petroleum to fish oil. That's the one nobody can explain.

Weirdly enough, my mechanic plays cello for the local symphony.

They're currently a bit shy of a light day out. Exactly how much energy do you think half century old solar panels would be generating if they had them?

Well it's not like he can do it himself any more, allegedly.

How the hell can this article start with the premise that this is a "Neo killer" and contain the sentence, "We still don't know what Intel will charge for the chip, nor do we know what you'll be able to buy a Core Series 3 laptop for."

"Intel releases chip to compete with $599 Neo, but who the fuck knows what it will cost" is not serious journalism.

I agree with the whole bit about "power users" being... let's go with "misguided" here, but this:

...Okay? You realize you can do that on Windows, too, right? Or Linux, or BSD, or...

And this bit:

GTFO of here with that BS, what could possess you to make such a bullshit claim... oh.

You're just one of those people that thinks your particular slice is the center of the universe. My dude, there are a shit ton more engineers out there in a ton more disciplines than just "software engineer" and the user population you're talking about is a small percentage of the whole.

This was a default judgement as no one was present to defend Anna's Archive. As such, since no one objected, the remedy is the one proposed by the plaintiffs. This is how the legal system works, there is nothing unusual going on here.

The "worldwide injunction" is, however, an issue the judge should have stepped in on. The USSC ruled on the subject last year that universal injunctions are beyond the power of a district court to grant.

Based on my experiences as a teenager, I would say that "typing and mousing" did indeed affect my reproductive success... but not in a positive manner.

It's 1996 all over again... ___blank___ but on the internet, err, but video, err, in the metaverse, crap crap crap, uh, on the block chain, err, we mean AI, this time for real. That's it. It's AI. We're artificially intelligent now.

Because motors could be used to drive an unlicensed CNC machine. And maybe ban magnets too. Who needs magnets?

Make all unlicensed possession of iron a punishable offense. There's no reason any human should have iron on or about their person unless they are attempting to make a dangerous and deadly weapon. NO EXCEPTIONS.