You mistake me. I am not trolling, nor do I care about the argument you are having with everyone else in this thread. One guy posted data, you did not. You have, in the post above, followed up with data, which makes your argument at least worth considering. I will note, however, that it refers to ballots where people either voted twice, or ballots where people did not actually punch the candidate and instead left a slight impression, rather than what most of us would think of when the word "recount" is used.
I will leave it to the people you are arguing with to decide if the evidence moves them, but I am reasonably certain it will not (to be fair, I'm pretty sure if you had voice recordings of Justice Scalia saying, "Dude, we totally stole that election," you wouldn't convince them. I am equally certain, though, that no amount of evidence will convince you that you are wrong, either).