I sounds like big (physical) networks, with very few users (although it could be _very_ useful at times of emergency).
I want to see the Horizontal launch facilities.
No, that would be the Air Force in this case.
I think the research part is what is costing $300 Million; just to maintain the grounds/buildings would most likely be the $5 million per year.
I followed the link, and it is very light on details. For $1600, this had better be a super camera.
My experience with silicone oil was that it was very _thin_, and tended to try to creep out of its containers (lubricant for the heads on a drum recorder, back in the 70's and 80's). We weren't using it for heat transfer, just lubrication, and used cotton wicks to pull the oil out of the tray and apply it to the drum (no pump required).
Link to Original Source
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned that this sounds suspiciously like the business model of Radio. It will be interesting to see if they have the ability to keep track of where to send all the checks, unless they have a very small playlist.
I would have guessed that it was closer to 21.3 TB. If it's only 21.3 GB, I could store a couple copies on my computer at home.
That's a hot CPU for a hot price. Take that any way you want.
But what about 42? (Don't panic if it fails)
Once the test is loaded, it runs from memory, and CD speed will not (should not) affect the test results.
in the Best catagory, not the most reliable catagory. So, they may win a partial victory here, but shouldn't get all of the catagories approved.
Who decides what games even get looked at for classification? What if they just haven't gotten to the game you want yet? Is there a backlog of games to classify? So many 'gotchas', so little logic/common sense/ways to appeal. My heart goes out to you Australian gamers.