4-Billion-Pixel Panorama View From Curiosity Rover 101
from the take-a-look dept.
|
|
Megan Garber is being destroyed in the comment section of The Atlantic. There are nearly 50 comments... all of them pointing out how clueless she is about design, how Wikipedia is actually well laid out, that she doesn't know what an empirical truth is , etc...
Oddly enough, Wikipedia has some interesting info on The Atlantic-
"In 2010, The Atlantic posted its first profit in the last decade... was the result of a cultural
transfusion, a dose of counterintuition and a lot of digital advertising revenue."
It has already been suggested in the comments that she may be nothing more than a comment troll.
If you found Megan's article to be insightful, be sure to read her similarly penetrating articles:
Taco Bell vs. Old Spice: The Twitter War That Wasn't
Here Are 10 GIFs That Will Restore Your Faith in GIFs
'New York Times' + Buzzfeed = OMG
Slashdot of 10 years ago would have had a lively debate about the ethics of your experiments and the pro/ con of animal experiments used in education. Sadly, you can see many of the comments have devolved into first posts, Nazi comparisons and knee-jerk animal rights propaganda. Some of us old timers would have been thrilled to be able to probe neural activity in advanced biology (in addition to fetal pig dissection ). Don’t take the negative comments too personally, were not the Slashdot we one were.
Twelve years ago an almost identical paper was on the office wall of a chemical engineering professor I had in college. I'm mostly kidding with my subject line - I expect there's novelty in the new paper and just want to point out that this has been used as a model system (probably many times) before now.
I believe you are referring to Md Nurul Hasan Khan. In 1999 he published a paper proving Guinness bubbles fall. As far as I know he was the first.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/03/19/1079199418340.html
In the long run, every program becomes rococco, and then rubble. -- Alan Perlis