Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Can't eat what you don't grow (Score 0) 690

by r.freeman (#49014363) Attached to: Free-As-In-Beer Electricity In Greece?
Commie, please.
The corporations exploit you because they can write bad law and ban/regulate many things. This is fault of democracy.
Without democratic process, with local small governments, this is not an issue.
As for wealth distribution, it distributes in the fair way: if people want to pay 100 more for what person B does, then he will be earning 100 more. Deal with it, don't be a greedy jellous gnome. Why don't you do what B does?
If you are forbidden to do what B does, then it's fault of democracy: e.g. state monopoly on making drugs, or medicine, patents.

Comment: Re:Female-Run Companies Often do Better Than Male- (Score 1) 271

by r.freeman (#48987581) Attached to: Female-Run Companies Often do Better Than Male-Run Ones (Video)

Except that the people who actually run the company (CEO, CFO, CTO, President) are all males.

If you count the employees in the group pic, you'll see 12 men and 6 women. Articles like this do more harm than good.

LOL! :D
Also look at "our leadership" = out of 8, 7 are male :&

Comment: Re:Sexist article (Score -1, Flamebait) 271

by r.freeman (#48984535) Attached to: Female-Run Companies Often do Better Than Male-Run Ones (Video)
If Negros are rare as CEOs of successive companies then this is because either
1) they statistically are less often good at it
2) or, there is some law making it unfiarly hard for them to do it
If 2 then remove this law (but there isn't), if 1 then it's fair.

In addition if 1 is result of bad eduction then again
1) if it's that the Black people prefer e.g. sports, then it's their will, let them do what they want 2) if there is some law e.g. making it illegal to teach Black people.. but there is none

basically all this problems are solved by de-regulation. Or if we will come down to "this is because most blacks are poor - and this is OUR fault because we enslaved them" then very good, pay them proper (one time!) reperations and from then it's in their corner.

I wonder if someone would actually solved social problems in fair way as above, instead of milking SJW drama in the lewrong way.

Comment: Sexist article (Score 5, Insightful) 271

by r.freeman (#48983479) Attached to: Female-Run Companies Often do Better Than Male-Run Ones (Video)
Would this article show up when talking about:
"Male-Run companies often do better than Female-run ones" ?
Would it? On Slashdot the news for SJWs - apparently.

Btw such article would be correct (this statement is correct).
Same goes for...
Streight-run companies often do better than homosexual-run ones.
Homosexuals-run companies often do better than streight-run ones.
White-run companies often do better then Blakcs-run ones.
Blacks-run companies often do better then normale ones.
etc.
Does anyone thing ONLY male CEO can ever bring a success?
Of course not. What are you fighting with Slashdot?

Real Users find the one combination of bizarre input values that shuts down the system for days.

Working...