Comment Re:Given the economics, it might not help much (Score 1) 43
Consider the cost of a new EV, and the insurance, the end of the federal EV incentive program this year and what an Uber driver makes these days, and it may not be enough of an incentive.
On this I partially agree as for new cars this is less then the incentive program which they already ignored.
But it might be worth a used EV.
Certainly, Uber trips are probably an ideal case for electric vehicle use (short trips, lower speeds with stop and go regen braking) but the economics of Uber driving are probably pretty touch and go from the various reports I am reading. (I would like to hear from Uber drivers directly on this matter)
Most Uber and Lyft rides I've taken are in older, well maintained cars. They probably are owned outright or the payment is reasonable.
A lot of the ones I've seen are newer leased vehicles.
If their daily mileage can be done on a single charge the fuel savings could add up pretty quick. Otherwise a hybrid is a no-brainer.
Just looking at the payment and insurance for my wife's (purchased used for around $30k) Tesla, and I am not sure if there is any financial savings in the fuel costs in the end,
Tesla's are notoriously expensive to insure, but fuel costs would definitely be lower with at-home charging.
Public chargers? Not so much.
I think this incentive would appeal most to someone who lives in a household with multiple incomes, where the rideshare income is supplementary to another, higher income. Then it would be an incentive for someone who can actually afford to take advantage of it. My three cents.
I'm assuming there's conditions around it. But it does seem to push against Uber's narrative that their drivers are contractors and not employees.