
Journal pudge's Journal: More on 527s and Coordination 33
CaptTofu sent me this great link detailing some of the links between Kerry and 527s (news to me: Ickes, head of Media Fund, is also on the DNC board). Some of the links there are IMO rather silly, but there it is.
Now, to be clear: none of this is evidence of coordination, just as none of the links with Bush are such. What it shows is not that Kerry is doing anything illegal, but that -- as I said in the other journal entry -- Kerry is a hypocrite when he attacks Bush's links to SBVT. Kerry's links are as strong or stronger than the ones Bush has to SBVT, and much more significant, given the much greater amount of money involved.
no comparison (Score:1)
At least four SBVTers have been exposed as liars (or at least in stark contradiction with earlier documentation or recordings.) The doctor who claims he treated Kerry for a wound documented as having been treated by someone else. The guy who claims Kerry wasn't being shot at when both of their bronze star citations and everyone else who was there say they were. O'Niell
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
As to burying anything, it's Kerry who's been keeping this discussion alive. It's he who filed the FEC complaint, it's he and Edwards who have given speeches about it, it's their campaign who made an ad about it, it's their friend (Cleland) who wrote a letter about it. What has the Bush campaign done, but deny involvement? Your cries about buryi
Re:no comparison (Score:1)
I think they're rather important because the content matters. Allying oneself closely to a 527 that doesn't fabricate lies (even if they are propagandist) is fine, but being allied with a 527 that DOES fabricate slanderous lies (it is being argued) *IS SIGNIFICANT* no matter that he's _slighly less_ closely allied.
Why does the "level of closeness" matter more than contents, or rather hows is it that the contents are off-topic?
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
No, because I have been talking about what the Kerry campaign has been primarily talking about, the issue they raised when they filed their FEC c
other GOP 527s w/o FEC complaints (Score:1)
Here is a list of the Republican 527s with documented coordination (in the general sense of the word; I realize that the legal definition of coordination is technical and interpreted largely at the discretion of the FEC) with the Bush campaign:
Re:other GOP 527s w/o FEC complaints (Score:2)
Because they haven't hurt him. As noted, they've only spent a tiny fraction of the money the pro-Kerry 527s have spent. So too have the SBVT, but they actually got press, and started to hurt Kerry. So he filed the complaint, knowing that many people will be duped into believing that an accusation of wrongdoing is evidence of wrongdoing. He also knows that most people will conflate the issue o
Re:other GOP 527s w/o FEC complaints (Score:2)
Re:other GOP 527s w/o FEC complaints (Score:2)
Re:other GOP 527s w/o FEC complaints (Score:2)
Re:other GOP 527s w/o FEC complaints (Score:2)
Re:no comparison (Score:1)
Are saying that the Bush campaign workers who have had to resign due to their SBVT involvement are thereby less significant than Democrats who haven't had to resign because of their 527 involvements?
The problems with SBVT coordination, as opposed to, for example, the Bushes coordination with the 527 that puts out Republican Woman magazine, have to do preci
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
I am saying that it is clearly not significant evidence either way. How could it be? People resign all the time because things look bad, even if they are not. That's clearly the case here, as there is not one jot of evidence of coordination.
That's the reason that the SBVT are considered such a smear and t
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Hold on a second. So, having someone making contrary assertions to someone else's statements is now "distinct lies"? OK, so, given that the Kerry campaign has essentially conceded that on both the Cambodia story and the nature of the first Purple Heart, the SBVT account is correct and Kerry's was wrong, how exactly would you characteri
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
NO!!!
It is a luxury. I happen to be able to afford some minimal insurance (USD $3000 yearly deductable) and am glad for it. But I am insured ONLY because I place insurance as a higher priority than getting drunk off my ass on weekends like many of the other hourly wage earning citizens I live / work with.
If insurance and responsibility was a priority for people, then alcohol and
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Sorry for the confusion.
jason
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
The number of Americans living in poverty increased by 1.3 million last year, while the ranks of the uninsured swelled by 1.4 million, the Census Bureau reported Thursday.
It was the third straight annual increase for both categories.
I hope we can get back to the issues soon.
He did, but in a small mention down in the last few lines of the post. I did not notice a specific Journal related to this topic (I hav
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
happens all the time to me...
lousy lack of perfect memory
jason
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
No, he was complaining in his first post about the number of uninsured increasing:
Considering that for most of America's existence virtually
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Cable had shit to do with it.
Re:no comparison (Score:1)
Holy crap! I'm in poverty! Someone should have told me. -- Then again, who in college doesn't fall into that group?
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
=)
Re:no comparison (Score:1)
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Way to have a heart, man.
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
jason
Re:no comparison (Score:1)
And you also know what Mark Twain said about "lie, damn lies and statistics", don't you?
It would be great to get back to the issues...
Like how Kerry is going to help the economy by raising taxes.
Or lower gas prices by raises taxes on it.
Would love to see some more of that substance.
Re:no comparison (Score:2)
Like how Kerry is going to help the economy by raising taxes.
Yes, his plan there is quite confusing. He wants to raise taxes on incomes over $200K, and lower corporate taxes. Supposedly, he wants to lower the deficit by increasing revenues, but he also wants to significantly increase spending, and he says the additional revenues will come from the tax increase (but how much will it be offset by the tax cut?), and improved economic activity that will increase
No evidence? (Score:2)
A Bush campaign lawyer advised a 527 on an advertisement. This much is admitted already. And the standard for coordination is met when there is any advertisement that is "the result of material involvement of a candidate or campaign in decisions on the content, intended audience, distribution plans, timing or media used."
That same lawyer, in admitting his involvement with the 527 and stepping down, also issued a stat
Re:No evidence? (Score:2)
That is false. He advised them on election law. No one admitted he advised them on an advertisement. You're just making that up.
And the standard for coordination is met when there is any advertisement that is "the result of material involvement of a candidate or campaign in decisions on the content, intended audience, distribution plans, timing or media used."
There is no evidence his advice was related in any wa
Re:No evidence? (Score:2)
You are correct, my mistake.
I was actually going to close the window and not bother posting, but I hit return by accident. Oh well. Maybe we should make the default action Preview, instead of Submit.
Re:No evidence? (Score:2)