Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
United States

Journal pudge's Journal: Start Packing 10

So I was thinking about a couple of things this afternoon.

The first is Heller, the gun rights decision that came down today. It does not take away any rights, or open the door to such. But some people think it could make the anti-gun crowd more active.

The second is the Kennedy v. Louisiana decsion from yesterday, in which the Supreme Court held as evidence to support its decision the fact that most states were not exercising their rights, so therefore maybe that right (to execute child rapists) doesn't exist any more.

And that reinforces my long-held view that it is crucially important that everyone -- even if you don't have a gun! -- gets a concealed carry permit, if you think we should have the right to keep and bear -- not just in our homes, but in public -- arms. If a million people have permits, the state will be far less likely to try to take that right away.

Washington is a shall-issue state, meaning unless there is a specific reason in the law why you can't have a permit to carry a concealed weapon, they must issue it to you within a set time period, upon receipt of your paperwork, fees, and so on.

If -- I shudder at the thought -- Gregoire wins re-election, I have no doubt that many Democrats will be coming after our gun rights (along with the income tax and other leftist agenda items they've been holding off on until after this election). But that effort won't get anywhere if we exercise our rights now.

And if we have that many people with permits it also removes the main argument against licensure: that it gives a list of gun owners to the government. Sure, there's a legitimate fear that with hundreds or thousands of people on the list, they could come after those people specifically. But hundreds of thousands? Millions? At some point it is beyond their control.

You protect your rights by exercising them. So get your license. You don't even have to carry a gun with you: just protect your right to do so. If you don't, you might lose it.

Cross-posted on <pudge/*>.

This discussion was created by pudge (3605) for no Foes, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Start Packing

Comments Filter:
  • I have my concealed carry permit here in Arizona, but I often open carry as well. One of the reasons I do so is to maintain the legal right to open carry and keep it from slipping into social unacceptability.

    http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/J_M_Lambert/Guns/OCatcarshow.jpg [photobucket.com]

    • by FroMan ( 111520 )

      If you didn't mention Arizona, I'd say you are a fellow I work with. If you are looking for your long lost twin, he's in Michigan.

  • The most disturbing thing to me about today's decisions is the continuing trend of judges deciding arbitrarily what the ""evolving standards of decency" are. It seems that the political process would be far better at arriving at that. Not to mention that we could have states with different standards. Judges' decisions on these things seem really arbitrary. At least there's a connection between the public and legislators and executives.
    • by pudge ( 3605 ) * Works for Slashdot

      The most disturbing thing to me about today's decisions is the continuing trend of judges deciding arbitrarily what the ""evolving standards of decency" are.
      I presume you are referring to the capital punishment case, not the gun case?

      If so, I agree wholeheartedly.

  • Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] (ymmv) says different.

    I used to have a concealed pistol permit but let it lapse. A friend of mine has a concealed permit and has no problem getting it renewed.

    A guy I work with runs a website (I cannot remember which it is but I think this is it [opencarry.org]) that fully details all of Washington States carry laws.

    Did the law change when I wasn't looking?
    • by pudge ( 3605 ) * Works for Slashdot

      I am not sure what you mean. Did the law change to what from what?

      • by Talinom ( 243100 ) *
        My bad. I read this sentence incorrectly:

        Washington is a shall-issue state, meaning unless there is a specific reason in the law why you can't have a permit to carry a concealed weapon, they must issue it to you within a set time period, upon receipt of your paperwork, fees, and so on.
        • by pudge ( 3605 ) * Works for Slashdot

          Ah, phew. I thought maybe I screwed up something major. :-)

          Maybe we need a National Gun License Day. Everyone not licensed go out and get licensed, whether you have a gun or not, for the maximum gun license you can get (and not break the bank).

          Some people will be against it, but I still think it is better than the alternatives.

          • by ncc74656 ( 45571 ) *

            Maybe we need a National Gun License Day. Everyone not licensed go out and get licensed, whether you have a gun or not, for the maximum gun license you can get (and not break the bank).

            CCWs in Nevada are issued for particular guns with which you have qualified on a gun range. If you want to get a CCW (I've not bothered to do so yet), you need to get a gun first and develop at least a basic level of proficiency in using it. Concealed carry of guns other than those on your permit (not sure if it's by type

  • ... to opening up the convenience store!

Somebody ought to cross ball point pens with coat hangers so that the pens will multiply instead of disappear.

Working...