Actually I never said he was a pedo just that he would fit in with them. So check 1 against you passing 6th grade reading comprehension. And implying that anyone would need to lie or even exaggerate anything to make Kimmy look bad. Check 1 against your life having worth :) have a good day.

No its a strait forward attempt to discredit you by pointing out that you think this this guy is "cool" despite his obviously massive "creep factor" . This is the kind of guy that if he walked into a room families would just pull their kids close and tell them to not go near that guy. Seriously dude if you think this guy is "cool" and are not just trolling check yourself.

Whats wrong with him? lol

He is directly responsible for many thousands of deaths ,clearly psychotic and looks and acts like a pedophile/general nut job? and you ask whats wrong with him?

You really do deserve the lifetime achievement award for no taste at all and should seriously get proffesional help if you honestly think that he is a "cool guy". Or you are trolling.

..... you thought that Kim Jong Il was a "cool guy"........wtf dude I think you just won the award for worst taste in the world..... If you put him in a room full of pedophiles and sociopaths you would not be able to pick that guy out of the bunch.

Seriously I wouldn't wish'Arrested Development' on my worst enemies.

Your logic is wrong its not "So, because they did something ethically wrong and against the law it's OK to do the same to them? " its ... " Because they did something ethically wrong and against the law it's OK to punish them if they law failed to do so" If someone does something unspeakably horrible to a member of your family and legally gets away with it, it is more than morally justifiable to extract your pound of flesh. Now I certainty am not recommending killing anyone in this situation, however for the gross misconduct news corp has committed on sooo many occasions the organization should be proverbially (and possibly actually) burned to the ground. Everyone associated with the firm should permanently have their resumes tarnished with the name "news corp" and thus hopefully never be able to find work within journalism ever again.

The problem is the breadth of the patent. "Hey dude your code does something kinda similar but not really but hey I to have a variable called "counter" so you violated my patent and now I will send my army of 100 million dollar lawyers at you and you cant afford to do anything so you LOOZE"

Any design is math Yes code is at least 1 step closer but a design for a really sweat engine can be just as well represented with '1's and '0's

Protectionism does not create monopolies as a mater of fact.

To be fair I am pro GM foods here. However I would not be surprised if there are some health risks with some. Id actually be surprised if at least some day we dont end up killing people with them.. To me its just the price you have to pay for progress.

Saying GMO food presents health risks is so compleatly vague its crazy. Its kinda like laying "gases" present health risks ya..... some do... others not so much.

except we spend billions keeping these "people" alive

The average american should go with eating 30% less. But ya I get your point but i still disagree I think it is the stupids. I see these shows with some moronic family complaining about how its cheaper/quicker to feed their family off fast food and that it fills up their kids more. Meanwhile their kids are fatasses and diabetic ... maybe their kids should be a little hungry it would do some good

Not possible. Testing everything to the extent you like is not possible. If we were to do what you would like we would spent nearly 100% of our time testing every last product for the next 100years just to get out 1 years worth of product.......

Realistically.. You are the testing. If you eat or use something than you die than than they have a product which failed. Development of this world is proceeding too fast for complete testing of most if not any product.

It is when you are going down to details that 99.9% of the population cant make any kind of informed decision on. Im not 100% sure that fits this situation but that is the argument the poster is making.

He probably would argue that its about as informative as listing the break downs of every atomic isotope within a food product. Informative... but useless information.