That's what various larger cities have been doing here in NL: building Park&Ride hubs on the periphery.
We have them here in the USA too, especially in California. We use them both for rail and express buses. We need more rail, and more park & rides.
I am wondering if "hybrid" trains would be a good idea though. They would have sufficient batteries to travel a few miles, and be recharged when there is an overhead wire.
These are in fact already a thing, and as you surmise, a good one. It lets you only run catenary wires where they are convenient.
If they ever finish debian to use a single init system and actually have some consistency
They did finish Debian to use a single init system, it is called systemd and it sucks. If you install another init system you have to do a shitload of work to un-systemd it, which is why Devuan exists. They do that work for you. Debian USED to use a single init system (init and compatibles, you could switch between them freely without having to do anything else) but then they added systemd support in the name of GNOME support, at a time when GNOME popularity was waning and while systemd was particularly terrible software. This was frankly insane. Many of the gigantic bugs in systemd have been fixed but many others are wontfix, like early boot logging which doesn't work and forces you to use a debugger to figure out why your system won't boot.
TL;DR: They did exactly what you wanted and it was a terrible decision that set Debian back years and led to the creation of yet another Debian derivative to restore it to do things in the Unix way.
I agree with you. The only place roadway charging maybe makes sense is on interstates, but you have to build an awful lot of it to make it worthwhile. I also agree that it by far makes the most sense to put charging on parking lots, and I've been preaching that here for a lot of years. They are obvious places to put solar farms, and we should focus on parking lots until all the convenient ones are covered.
Newton spent his last years looking for something that doesn't exist and doesn't make sense
Nikola Tesla fell in love with a pigeon
Josephson seems like the least batshit of these so far, but he's had to retract claims he made about new kinds of energy made with the mind repeatedly.
Smart and capable people can fall for stupid bullshit and become obsessed with it.
Now I don't think the American people are stupid enough to elect Trump a third time
Of course they are. Look at how many people are still defending him. You're betting against human stupidity, which is classically stupid.
Good thing Bill Clinton signed the TCA in 1996 and allowed Fox and Sinclair to do a media consolidation. That rapey fuck actually claimed it would increase competition, what a slimy piece of shit.
#inb4 some clown brings up the Fairness doctrine that never worked.
After a lot of thought, I think at the moment it should be that people should take classes and labs.
Carpentry 102: Guillotines
Mechanical Engineering 303: How to implement full-auto sears
EE 202: Designing face recognition attack quadcopters for fun and profit
I've been seeing a lot of people saying they ditched redhate recently, some of them even over their abuse of the GPL. I wonder what the numbers look like.
Do you have calculations to make every road in the US function this way,
No, I've been a bit lazy about that, if I'm honest. And I usually am. But you'd start from city centers and push out to where you can put cheap parking, which you'd combine with solar farms of course. I don't envision eliminating cars from everywhere ever and I also don't expect it would make sense to do all at once. I guess I'll have to go looking for papers on this soon. It's so tedious when you don't have institutional access...
The right solution is vehicles on rails, which solve the steering, tire dust, and tire inefficiency problems. All of the attempts to make cars make sense in this age are wasted effort. Cars make sense for some situations, but not the one we're in now where we have way too many of them for our own good.
"You could outlaw those payday loan companies and it would not make any of the people who do business with them less poor."
Yes, that's one way to paraphrase what I wrote.
Some of us want everyone to have what they need more than we want some people to have more than they can use, and see anything else as not only heartless and sociopathic, but literally insane.
"To date, the net effect of "disruptive" businesses has been an overall increase in prosperity and opportunity."
I reject your framing. The effect of modern capitalism is destruction of our life support system for temporary profit and it is predicated upon the murders of millions.
If they only cared about small government, yes, they would. That is, if they were actually conservatives. But what they mostly want is for people they don't like to suffer. What is logical or provides for the most people at the lowest cost is irrelevant to them.
Have you reconsidered a computer career?
