Comment Re: Double standards (Score 1) 77
Clownstroke is not required for compliance, there are other tools which do what it does.
Clownstroke is not required for compliance, there are other tools which do what it does.
The timing of an attack ad is good, but people have short memories, so the timing of THIS ad is crap. They should have released an ad like this within a couple of weeks of when clownstroke failed.
The failures on Linux could be repaired remotely, unlike the infamous failure that took down all of those windows machines. Not surprised you're trying to equate the failures, though.
Apple sells the devices to humans who then own them.
We do not need more houses. We need to seize them from those keeping them empty and put people in them.
Endless growth is called cancer.
There is no planet b.
We haven't developed space enough to move industry there.
Do the math, instead of meth
"A free and completely voluntarist market is the only real measure of value"
So the only real value is in libertarian fantasies?
Can't wait for it all to crash and you to lose your smugness with your shitcoins
Your not being intelligent enough to understand what's wrong with systemd jibes with your being too cowardly to not post such a shit opinion anonymously
Dumb cope. They could convert local accounts to network accounts if a user tries to use a feature which requires them.
That's what various larger cities have been doing here in NL: building Park&Ride hubs on the periphery.
We have them here in the USA too, especially in California. We use them both for rail and express buses. We need more rail, and more park & rides.
I am wondering if "hybrid" trains would be a good idea though. They would have sufficient batteries to travel a few miles, and be recharged when there is an overhead wire.
These are in fact already a thing, and as you surmise, a good one. It lets you only run catenary wires where they are convenient.
If they ever finish debian to use a single init system and actually have some consistency
They did finish Debian to use a single init system, it is called systemd and it sucks. If you install another init system you have to do a shitload of work to un-systemd it, which is why Devuan exists. They do that work for you. Debian USED to use a single init system (init and compatibles, you could switch between them freely without having to do anything else) but then they added systemd support in the name of GNOME support, at a time when GNOME popularity was waning and while systemd was particularly terrible software. This was frankly insane. Many of the gigantic bugs in systemd have been fixed but many others are wontfix, like early boot logging which doesn't work and forces you to use a debugger to figure out why your system won't boot.
TL;DR: They did exactly what you wanted and it was a terrible decision that set Debian back years and led to the creation of yet another Debian derivative to restore it to do things in the Unix way.
I agree with you. The only place roadway charging maybe makes sense is on interstates, but you have to build an awful lot of it to make it worthwhile. I also agree that it by far makes the most sense to put charging on parking lots, and I've been preaching that here for a lot of years. They are obvious places to put solar farms, and we should focus on parking lots until all the convenient ones are covered.
Newton spent his last years looking for something that doesn't exist and doesn't make sense
Nikola Tesla fell in love with a pigeon
Josephson seems like the least batshit of these so far, but he's had to retract claims he made about new kinds of energy made with the mind repeatedly.
Smart and capable people can fall for stupid bullshit and become obsessed with it.
A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson