Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Seriously though, why a singularity? (Score 1) 227

by pauljlucas (#47528875) Attached to: Black Holes Not Black After All, Theorize Physicists

Why wouldn't a black hole a big star on the inside?

Because the gravity is too intense for even the neutrons to support its weight and there's currently no other known force or mechanism known that can stop the collapse. You might be right, but something new would have to be discovered or theorized to allow for that possibility.

Comment: Re:WTF rich people? (Score 1) 1330

by pauljlucas (#47357607) Attached to: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Religious Objections To Contraception

How about I choose women to have personal responsibility? Why does them having sex instantly mean I have a bill to pay?

The hard reality is that it's never going to be 100%. So what do you do? Let the kids starve to death? Or force the mother into doing crimes or prostitution just to feed her kids?

Comment: Re:If they walk away with this money... (Score 1) 448

by pauljlucas (#47306033) Attached to: $500k "Energy-Harvesting" Kickstarter Scam Unfolding Right Now
Care don't have to be on it constantly. Once the glass breaks, it's stays broken. Debris will scratch the glass making it more translucent rather than transparent reducing its effectiveness. Roadways don't track the sun making solar cells much less efficient. LEDs aren't visible in direct sunlight especially at shallow angles. The glare from any reflected light will blind drivers. As he rightly points out, putting the solar cells NEXT TO the road works much better. There's simply no reason to put them IN THE road even if it did work.

And the idea of putting it in parking lots is even dumber. Yeah, parking lots where cars are parked on it during the day (this blocking the sun) and empty at night (where there's no sun).

But if you want to donate money, go right ahead.

Comment: Re:If they walk away with this money... (Score 0) 448

by pauljlucas (#47305891) Attached to: $500k "Energy-Harvesting" Kickstarter Scam Unfolding Right Now
Huge different between a solar WALKway (foot traffic) and ROADway (auto traffic). Thunderf00t,, the creator of all the videos, is a pretty sharp guy. Watch and you might learn something. It's not my job to force-educate you. If you don't want to watch, don't. I don't care.

Comment: Re:Why not patent compression algorithm? (Score 1) 263

by pauljlucas (#47286109) Attached to: The Supreme Court Doesn't Understand Software
As it was explained to me by a patent attorney, what is colloquially known as a "software patent" really isn't. Rather, it's a patent on the resulting machine that software transforms a general purpose machine (computer) into.

If I had a black box wherein you fed in paper tape encoding data on one end and different paper tape with the data compressed came out the other end (thus taking less tape), that would be a data compression machine. Certainly, if the black box had no software at all but was instead a bunch of gears and such, i.e., totally mechanical, you'd have to agree that the machine would be patentable.

But it's still the type of machine that's being patented (a data compression machine). The preferred embodiment as described in the patent is just one way to do it. Now if instead of gears you had a computer running software, well that doesn't change the functioning of the machine -- the tape output is the same for a given input. Therefore, the fact that a particular embodiment just might happen to use a computer and software rather than gears is irrelevant.

Time sharing: The use of many people by the computer.