Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Re:The elephant in the room (Score 1) 173

The suggestion was that white people don't get punished when they are guilty, while at best, black people are.

That's a failure of the system at punishing white people. You have a point only if you can show that most blacks are being punished when they're actually innocent. If they're guilty, then they should be punished.

Comment Re:The elephant in the room (Score 1) 173

While there are cases of innocent blacks being locked up, certainly some actually are guilty. They were rightly locked up. Your dad not being locked up when he actually was guilty is the failure here and doesn't mean that blacks who actually are guilty shouldn't have been locked up.

Comment Flawed article (Score 1) 425

Ultra-marathon running is used for an analogy. The thing about running in any race is that nobody else is affected by one's running ability. If one is a mediocre runner, one doesn't negatively affect one's co-runners; nor the quality of one's product (because there isn't one); nor the profitability of one's company (because there isn't one of those either); nor the satisfaction of one's users or the security of their data (because there aren't users either). Hence, it's not clear that running is a good analogy.

There are also some careers where nobody wants a mediocre practitioner. When one's freedom is on the line, nobody wants a mediocre lawyer; when one's life is on the line, nobody wants a mediocre doctor. Therefore, why should it necessarily be the case that companies would want mediocre programmers? Some programming does have life on the line: software in cars, planes, nuclear reactors, or Therac-25 radiation machines; or people's or company's finances: software in banking or stock trading.

There are also some careers where you simply can't succeed at being mediocre, for example any kind of research scientist: if you don't publish good work (and have the kind of innate ability to enable you to do good work so you can publish), you simply won't succeed. How do you we know whether programming is the kind of job where one can be mediocre and succeed?

I've interviewed lots of candidates, many of whom claim N years experience in language X. I'm often stunned at how much many don't know -- stuff that anybody who completes a CSX101 or algorithms or data structures course should know. Is that mediocre?

Comment Re:Misleading assertions (Score 3, Informative) 188

Why are we carbon based and not silica based? Either works just fine.

No it doesn't. If you do the chemical equations for respiration using carbon, you end up with CO2 as a waste product that's easy for an organism to get rid of since it's a gas. If you substitute silicon for carbon, the equations still work but you end up with SiO2 as a waste product -- sand -- a solid that's pretty much impossible for an organism to get rid of.

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...