Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Omichad's FALSE claim off topic (Score 1) 160

CA & Thor SCHMUCK (you I suspect omnichad)

Wait...I just now saw this. Now you think my account belongs to the Computer Associates guy? I could understand you thinking an AC or two, but to think that he would pick some random persona just to persecute you...

You know, I didn't realize that bipolar people could have persecutory/paranoid delusions. I thought that was just schizophrenia. I just read up on it: http://psycheducation.org/diag...

It might be worth seeing a psychiatrist about your bipolar disorder. It might make a huge positive difference for you.

Comment Re:LOL: Where'd I threaten to sue? (Score 1) 160

Listing ONLY “Peter Kowalski” not my full name, easily apparent in the program itself, as Alexander Peter Kowalski. Thus, I’d never find it online) & this would be part of the grunds I am suing on if need be for libelling me online since 2004. This is not an idle threat, it is a certainty. I am rather insulted & furious regarding this incident that has long been hidden from myself via what I feel are nefarious means.
This is libel, no questions asked.

False claims of libel are completely on-topic.

Comment Re:I'm on topic omnichad troll, are you? (Score 1) 160

You brought up to flop on your face

Sounds messy. Still don't know what it is.

You fail on Computer Associates + Thor

You didn't follow through and sue. You didn't even settle out of court. You just followed the standard false positive removal procedure. Because false positives are a valid part of the malware detection process and there's already a reasonable way to handle it.

Comment Re:Mmell & Coren22 did it to me on /. (Score 1) 160

BOGUS DOWNMODS

Are you aware that the downmod was flagged as troll? Are you aware of what a troll is?

In Internet slang, a troll (/trol/, /trl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion,[3] often for their own amusement.

Which part of that definition are you saying was bogus on your downmod. Do you want me to break down the definition point by point with examples?

Comment Re:False accusations from you, CA/Thor Schmuck (Score 1) 160

APK, the fact still stands that you did so by following the normal false positive removal plan. The one that anyone can do without lawyers. You know, the 21 question test they just happened to have ready for you. Not a coincidence.

Call me or every anon coward posting in apk's defense him but we're telling the truth that you messed up and you'd have to prove we're him.

I don't have to prove you're you. Your alter ego just posts slightly more coherently. Maybe you should have that alter ego do all your posting. At least there's no bold or all caps.

But it sure was funny when you accused an AC of being me. "You'd have to prove" it's me. "You can't." But that's because it really wasn't me. I really haven't posted AC except when I've moderated. I don't have any reason to.

Comment Re:False accusations from you, CA/Thor Schmuck (Score 1) 160

No tune change. You haven't said anything new. What do you think they do with other false positives? Not have them fill out a 21 question questionnaire? Or did they write that just for you? I think Occam's Razor says they already had a 21 question test in place for ALL false positives - even the ones who don't bring in a lawyer.

Comment Re:CA & Thor Schmuck backed down fast though (Score 1) 160

Funny they saw it like my attorney did & I passed their removal test for their BLATANT FALSE POSITIVE TOO, eh?

Funny, that sounds like you did what they would have asked you to in the first place with no lawyers involved. It has nothing to do with your threats.

You literally followed their false positive removal process as a normal person would and still claim that you won because you paid a lawyer to tell you to do it.

All of your name calling and chest puffing is really unnecessary. You say you argue with facts, and yet you spend most of your post ranting like a lunatic in all caps and bold and not staying on topic at all. Keep your posts to the facts, and they'll be shorter and people will read them. Be nice to people in the process, and people won't call you a troll.

Comment Re:Eat your words again omnichad (Score 1) 160

You didn't answer anything with this post. But you are getting a lot more unstable. It typically takes you 3-5 more rants to get to this point, but this is the point where your babble becomes completely incomprehensible for the duration of the conversation.

I don't post as AC unless I've already used mod points on a thread, but if you think that I'm the only one who uses the word "untrustworthy" you are no more crazy than I already think you are.

Comment Re:Eat UR words: I did as attorney instructed (Score 1) 160

IF they did not, he told me I had a 250k lawsuit SURE WIN!

Lawyer's love to tell you that. It makes them money.

my ware is CLEAN & YOU NOW ADMIT IT loser!)

When did I say it was dirty? You keep trying to make this about your HOSTS file engine but I wasn't talking about it.

Nir is a nice guy who doesn't spam and doesn't troll. I even use his tools.

illogical ad hominem attacks on ME, but not disproving my points on hosts superiority on nearly every grounds conceivable! apk

That's because there's nothing wrong with your software. There's something wrong with you as a person. It's not ad hominem if you're the actual subject. It doesn't have to be that way. Just stop trolling.

Slashdot Top Deals

If it happens once, it's a bug. If it happens twice, it's a feature. If it happens more than twice, it's a design philosophy.

Working...