Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Possibly valid (Score 2) 53

And if it were simply just a CSS framework that also happened to work with Wordpress it wouldn't be such a simple case. As much as I hate to side with Automattic here, they should be defending their trademark against this. But since they are the bigger fish and as a show of goodwill to the developer community, they should put up an offer to help pay the costs associated with rebranding. Has to cost less than actually fighting it in court regardless.

Comment Re:My eyes, my control (Score 1) 71

It seems more like a legacy limitation of the medium,

The reason is that we still need it. The most we are hitting is maybe 120/240Hz and that is usually fake frames, which is too low to be truly realistic. With 24p your mind fills in the details better.

This is why The Hobbit at 48fps looked like a cheap video game, especially in effects shots. Real life would be motion blurred more by the eye, but they only had 48fps to work with so it looked hyperreal instead.

Comment Surprised (Score 2) 49

I'm not surprised that a large language model assumed the premise of the prompt and generated an answer, even if it was fabricated. They are basically designed around that. What surprises me is that Google took it offline rather than respond about her profound misunderstanding of how the things work. The guardrails in any of these systems are generally bad at estimating the truth of their own outputs. Especially as a chat goes on longer and the generation of fiction becomes part of the ongoing context.

Comment Re:These Are CAPTCHAS (Score 1) 52

Yeah, probably can't work around that without just subbing the word Test for Turing (and the word is already there). The acronym for DVD changed over time too. It's still DVD but went from Video to Versatile.

I don't think it's fair to say that acting alive is a measure of intelligence. Unless you count fine motor skills as a form of humanlike intelligence.

Comment Re:What was justification for Open Library? (Score 1) 39

During COVID they decided that copyright didn't matter and knowingly copied copyrighted works too. Once they realized that was a bad idea, they decided that since format shifting was fair use for the individual that they could do it themselves and then lend out the digital copy. Which was a wholly different item than the original physical copy that still existed and the courts weren't buying it.

The word "open" does not apply to this library in the sense of out of copyright, for the most part. These were nearly all in-copyright works that may or may not have been removed from the market.

Slashdot Top Deals

EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER

Working...