A new way to deal with your rejected papers.
A new way to deal with your rejected papers.
As cyberpunk dystopias go, this one isn't so bad. Hell, they pay me six figures to sit in front of a computer and write programs, something that I like to do anyway. I'll take that over subsistence farming or menial labor any day of the week.
Server 2016 is going per core licencing which means less cores overclocked
Given the drive to eke every last bit of economy (both dollars and joules) out of commodity server hardware, I see two possible outcomes for that: either future versions of Windows will have to reduce their licensing costs in the multicore scenarios, or most software will get ported over to other operating systems whose licensing costs are lower. (I'd imagine the latter is more sensible, since paying to license a GUI-based OS seems silly when running server software on a headless machine in a data center, but far be it from me to second-guess the IT industry)
With 4096 otherwise idle cores, it can make sense to calculate 1,000 possible scenarios in parallel and then ignore the 999 options you didn't need.
Well, maybe from a strict minimize-time-to-result perspective, but if we're also trying to minimize power usage (and given the subject of this article, we presumably are), then I'm not sure you're going to get any kind of efficiency win by doing 1000 times the necessary number of computations and throwing away almost all of them.
And in *two whole years*, they should have been able to establish that it was validating malware.
Is the app in question actually malware, according to Apple's definition of the term?
Or to put it another way, how evil does an application have to be before it should be labelled as malware? Is there a formal policy on this posted anywhere?
I still keep a landline for emergency, it's never failed in 40 years.
Of course, the flip side of that is that you're likely paying a significant monthly bill to keep that reliable land line active.
My building's two front-door call boxes were each using a land line for their call-up function, and they were costing the HOA $65/month each. I switched them over to VOIP, now they cost the HOA about 25 cents per month each (not including the $23/month DSL service, since we had that set up anyway for unrelated reasons).
And SD is not worth watching.
I don't get that logic -- if it's a good movie, it will still be a good movie in SD. If it's a bad movie, it will suck even more in HD.
The subset of movies that are worth watching in HD but not worth watching in SD must be very small -- Avatar, maybe?
Junk making the front page that talks to me like I don't already work in IT or understand how common household technologies work.
Who are you? I didn't understand how DSL worked until I read the article, now I do. (Well, probably not, but now I know more than I did)
People are getting so distracted by the word "luddite" that they've neglected to ask the important question: to what extent does having all of the solar panels mounted vertically affect their efficiency?
Granted, it looks cool, but I presume that most solar arrays are mounted horizontally (or at an angle determined by their location's latitude) so that they are as close to perpendicular as possible to the sun. Unless this installation is *really* far from the equator, it seems like they will be generating less electricity than they might have this way.
Microsoft is trying to 'innovate' another revolution it missed.
People running 7 and 8.1 can avoid the updates that add the spying to them, but since it's baked into Win10
Part of the operating system now, like IE?
For W7, I'm trying unchecking "give me recommended updates the same way I recieve important updates" in the Windows Update settings.
If I get W10 next week we'll know that that didn't work.
I'll just chime in.... my iPhone 4 lasted 5 years with absolutely no problems other than the battery life gradually diminishing. When I finally decided to upgrade, I paid a college kid $35 to replace the battery and now it works like new again (I passed it on to a relative to use as an mp3/audiobook player). I could have replaced the battery myself for about half that price, but I was too lazy to bother.
we don't allow the "public" to get in the way of corporate profits.
If the technology works, then a corporate-owned solar roadway could be just as profitable as any other corporate-owned solar farm, of which we have many. And if it doesn't work, then there's no point in installing it anyway.
That was my first reaction as well, but a roof structure would run about $4-5/watt for the system, with panels about 35% of the cost.
I think "roof" might be overkill, how about just a series of poles along the median strip, with solar panels placed on top of them and/or between them? The added cost would just be the cost of the poles, plus some additional wiring.
Sure, the surface area per mile of highway would be much less, but it's not like there is a shortage of miles of highway available.
10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.