anywhere north of the south pole such that, after walking south one mile, the "circumference" of that latitude is one mile, or some integer fraction (e.g., 1 mile west results in 4 "laps"), then one mile "north" will return to same starting point.
I'm reading Learning Java, which i recently purchased, and was typing in the examples from the book. As the book is a monster to hold, i ended up upgrading the ebook for $4.95. Dual screens with one for the PDF and the other for the IDE make it oh so much easier to type in. I also have been reading it on the macbo
If your "religion" demanded that you fire a machine gun into the air for 5 minutes a day, you'd find very little tolerance for it.
Why do you hate Islam?
Not likely. Obama doesn't have the balls. Nor does he have the desire.
They basically lied to her about the function of the app by not telling her that they would be tracking her every move 24/7. When she discovered she was being tracked all the time and her creepy boss was making creepy stalker-like comments about her, she complained, then removed the app. The company would be very smart to settle out of court.
Law enforcement isn't all that dangerous of a job. In fact, it doesn't make the top 10.
So much for theory of gun states having less crime.
When I looked at the estimated per-capita gun ownership rates by state, and the per-capita homicide rates per state, I didn't find a clear correlation.
Interestingly, it does appear that states with a higher gun homicide rates also have a correlation with higher non-gun homicide rates.
that would explain why you came so close yet utterly failed to detect the effect, thereby losing your nobel
You are assuming that we don't want the crew dead.
Unlike Edison, Faraday lacked bloodthirsty veniality.
You are confusing science with Popperian positivism.
...at some point you have to look...
sadly, no. there will always be a robert park who will not look.
Most families and many clans or tribes are communes.
Though they never explain how every planet in our solar system is warming if it is humans who are causing climate change
Credible citation needed. This claims otherwise:
The basis of this argument is that the sun must be causing global warming and in fact, warming throughout the solar system. There are several flaws in this line of thought. Firstly, the characterisation that the whole solar system is warming is erroneous. Around 6 planets or moons out of the more than 100 bodies in the solar system have been observed to be warming. On the other hand, Uranus is cooling (Young 2001).
Secondly, the theory that a brightening sun is causing global warming falls apart when you consider the sun has shown little to no trend since the 1950s. A variety of independent measurements of solar activity including satellite data, sunspot numbers, UV levels and solar magnetograms all paint a consistent picture. Over the last 35 years of global warming, sun and climate have been moving in opposite directions.