Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Look at the evidence! (Score 2) 227

Bart Ehrman is a new testament scholar. He studied theology at a religious university and when he started looking at the new testament with a scholar's eye, putting the gospels next to each other line by line, sentence by sentence, he lost his faith. He believes it's likely that Jesus existed though.

One remarkable thing is the end of the gospel according to Matthew where some monk in the middle ages added the resurrection to the text cause he couldn't understand why it was present in other gospels but missing in this one.

So I'm wondering what evidence the journalist you mention found. The evidence regarding even Jesus himself is extremely scant; outside the Bible there is only one reference to him that is considered genuine (by Josephus), even though even that one was embellished with extra wording afterwards. The resurrection story is found in just about every culture that ever existed (as far as we know). Are all of those true too?

I suspect that the journalist somehow "found god" and then found him in all sorts of places, looking at stones and bread and so one.

Comment Re:Only after 2015? (Score 1) 14

This seems fair enough to me. Apple was able to make a lot of money off their investment, which is not unreasonable: rolling out a product like the iPhone was a huge risk and some rewards are due if and when it works.

Once they started using it to strategically carve their market share in stone it became another matter.

Comment Re:Universities don't make good devs (Score 2) 77

They require so much time and effort from more senior colleagues before becoming productive

I've been wondering about this myself. People graduating now have been living on-screen for all their lives, but hardly ever question what a computer really is - as in, a really complicated Turing machine.

I get really strange questions when applying for jobs as a senior non-programmer (mostly automation, cloud, CI/CD, etc). Can I program? Well duh, who can't. Do I know python? Well duh, I can lookup the syntax (of course I actually do know python). People seem to think these are questions actually worth asking. Maybe we're transitioning into a world where you can't take knowledge like that for granted? Where juniors have never set a jumper switch, never bypassed the boot sequence to set a new root password, never cross compiled across architectures, never setup a home lab, can't setup a SQL server or speak to it directly, don't know how to setup a certificate authority, don't know how a file system works?

Comment Re:Irrelevance? (Score 1) 202

I owned 5 Audi's over two decades.

As time went on it became evident that innovation had stopped. The first one was a Quattro (4 wheel differential) which had superb driving safety characteristics. On subsequent cars they took away the Quattro feature and limited it to insanely expensive models. The rest of the car stayed pretty much the same: same options, every iteration, just more expensive. Not a single feature improvement.

The integrated GPS never got any updates except for the ridiculously expensive SD card purchases, plus no way to link your mobile phone GPS to the damn thing even though it had been standard on most non German cars by then.

It was evident that VW Audi stopped being a car manufacturer a while ago and was just keeping the lights on until they had squeezed every last bit of juice out of their customers. Thankfully I was able to switch away from them eventually (company car).

Good riddance, I will never buy a German car again.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us in trouble. It's the things we know that ain't so." -- Artemus Ward aka Charles Farrar Brown

Working...