Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: GeoWorks Ensemble FTW! (Score 1) 347

by mlosh (#34317144) Attached to: The Software That Failed To Compete With Windows

Back around 1991 I had a PC-clone 386SX. For you youngsters, thats a 32-bit CPU with a 16-bit (i.e. slow) data bus. I didn't have the coin to put Windows/386 or Windows 3.0 on it, but I could afford GeoWorks. It worked very well on that old machine. I kept using it after I moved on to a used 486. GeoWorks word processor was quite good for it's time. I was sad it never got much market share.

Comment: Re:Did similar back in MS-DOS 2.11 (Score 1) 582

by mlosh (#31512048) Attached to: Simpler "Hello World" Demonstrated In C

IIRC, a .com had to have code to fit entirely in a 64Kb memory segment, and had a fixed default memory map for the code, stack and data segments. This means the loader did not need to do any fancy relocation, so there were no relocation tables and a much simpler executable header structure (nearly(?) absent for a .com).

Space

SpaceX Successfully Launches Malaysian Satellite 1

Submitted by mlosh
mlosh writes "At 8:36 PM (PDT) Monday, a Falcon 1 booster successfully lifted off and launched the Malaysian Earth-observation satellite named RazakSAT into orbit, according to the company's webcast. After three unsuccessful launches, this latest mission is the second successful orbital flight in a row for Falcon 1 and the first time the private company was able to deploy an operational satellite for a commercial customer. The event should quiet naysayers who have openly doubted the capabilities of a small company to complete space missions. Next up: test flights of the much larger Falcon 9 model (which is intended for cargo supply missions to the ISS and possible manned flights) and a enhanced Falcon 1e model."

He who lives without folly is less wise than he believes.

Working...