If MidJourney and Photoshop are both tools, then so is a tool to download copyrighted films (which is clearly not respecting copyrights).
Copyright law already distinguishes between exact copies, derivative works, and fair use. All delineated by fuzzy boundaries. So it's contextual, based on circumstances. In the case of MidJourney, to comply with copyright law, they probably need to put up guardrails like GPT5 already has done. GPT5 will outright refuse to draw Superman, but MidJourney happily complies. If guradrails let something slip through, then maybe there should be a DMCA take-down mechanism.
It's super-trite, but true: technology can be used for good or bad.
I love the productivity gains and breadth of instructional knowledge AI has given me.
I hate that when I'm on Facebook I have to spend half my time blocking groups that generate AI summaries of classic TV shows and characters (that I'm otherwise a big fan of and follow).
Of the three "godfathers of AI", Yann LeCun is the only one who is not concerned about the dangers of AI. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-65886125
He disagrees with his fellow godfathers that AI is a risk to the human race.
"Text processing has made it possible to right-justify any idea, even one which cannot be justified on any other grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC.