
Journal mercedo's Journal: Two Signs of World Language 10
That is "there's no inflection in their words." and "they contain extremely enriched vocaburary." Both Chinese and English show a sign of world language.
English shows, in many aspects, a sign of good language. Probably proto-English used to have lots of paradigm change -inflection as other Indo-European language do. Nowadays we know Latin has more inflected words than English, but still English is an inflectional language.
On the other hands, Chinese is not inflectional. We say it 'analytical', for example, in English we say, ' In the past I went to the park.' or just 'I went to the park.' In Chinese, we say ' In the past we go to the park.' So if it's in present, we just say, 'I go to the park.' There's no inflection in Chinese. Then we noticed if we put the adverbal phrase like 'in the past', we don't have to use the past form 'went' to indicate the action was taken place in the past.
More and more English has been enriched by embracing many words - especially nouns from many other languages, less and less the inflection of English words is. I mean English words have been more rigid -fixed than before, because it is easier for non-native to learn not-inflected words.
Believe me now both world languages show strickingly similar syntax -both Chinese and English.
Intonation (Score:1)
Which is why far more chinese speak english than english people speak chinese. English is easier for a chinese person to learn t
Re:Intonation (Score:1)
Chinese is tonal, that is very unique to Chinese only. The pronounciation of our tongue is very similar to that of Spanish, not tonal at all so basically Chinese was very hard for us to pronounce and adopt. Since China had been very dominant power in all Asia, our national tongue was so affected by Chinese influence -about 80% of vacabulary was from Chinese, though, since there's no tonal distinction i
Re:Intonation (Score:2)
but yeah there are aqward situations love and rove* are both english words... but for the most part it's something that native speakers can puzzle out, english has several dialects in various regions of the world.... so
* = normally suffixed, 'roved, roving, rover' very few people use 'rove' which still generates confusion with loved, loving, a
Re:Intonation (Score:1)
Re:Intonation (Score:1)
Re:Intonation (Score:1)
When English were able to get rid of some phononyms like pool, can, mean, right, light, the time is nigh for English to be true only one world language.
Re:Intonation (Score:2)
Re:Intonation (Score:1)
I've no idea. So apparently Japanese is not tonal...
Re:Intonation (Score:1)
It's somewhat on topic, too. It's about a study wherein a number of sinophonic and anglophonic children who had begun musical training at about the same age and compared the numbers of those who developed perfect pitch. A higher percentage of the Chinese speakers had perfect pitch.
Re:Intonation (Score:1)
As I mentioned, they learn to speak English surprisingly quickly. Bo I Knee
Bo-I I-Love Knee-You, superficial difference is enormous but basically both two languages are very