I love the community here on Slashdot, but we're not the ones at risk from AI. We HAVE the experience and skills to know when AI gets it wrong, to know what tasks to ask AI to do, and to fix the problems that it creates. The real risk is to upcoming programmers. When will they be given a chance to learn these things and will we need as many? My son just graduated with a computer science degree and struggled for 5 months to find a job and even then it wasn't strictly programming. Maybe that is the answer that "strictly programming" jobs will become fewer and fewer and the "Software Engineer" will have to adapt to talk to people on a daily basis.

It's pretty clear that my low mileage ICE vehicle has lower lifetime emissions than an equivalent EV.

I specifically bought ICE for low annual mileage, long trips. EV is completely unsuitable, and would be more expensive, and more polluting.

I think the more appropriate study is that for many cases the EV is less CO2 emitting.
Not all cases, and they didn't consider pollution.

I do hold that for most people, and for my primary car, in my location an EV is a better choice.
But for some use cases they just don't make sense (and may never make sense)

The summary actually points out 45% of men ant 65% of women don't meet the RDA for protein.

I decided to track and realized I was eating too many calories and not enough protein. I'm targeting about 1g/lb.
I'm slightly under my daily calorie target, and find the protein highly satiating.

Big change was massive cuts to carbs, which means it's a bit heavier on fat relatively speaking.
4 cups of rice or mashed potato just doesn't fit in a lot of diets.

Does anyone have a source for the non-degree holding unemployment rate being 6.9? That's a very interesting piece of the puzzle.

We can't grow big tech because the government wants to overregulate and tax us.

Canadians don't want rich people, so the politicians demonize the rich and create a system that makes it hard to grow wealth

They already do.
At least Facebook, Netflix, do

I agree with renaming for clarity.

However I really only care about authorization, of which authentication is a necessary precondition anyway. Most of the time at least.

Wind and solar are. 10x cheaper?
In what universe.

I understand that they think its a crisis, and there should be no hesitation, and we should do whatever it takes no matter the cost.

But they simply not being honest.
They are also not listening to legitimate concerns or criticism.

I don't trust the. Climate extremists. It's a cult.

They charged developers per seat for a license.
Like pretty much every other software package.

They also ran their own ad network.

The real question is what are they trying to do.

Man pages are for someone who wants to type commands, most people don't want to type commands and be "computer geeks".

I'd consider
1. Try to install windows

If you install Linux, you're their personal tech support forever.
I'd go with any debian based distribution with the default desktop environment.

I've been using Linux a long time, and I still don't think it's an end user OS for people who don't care what the OS is.
I've even switched, my servers and development is on Linux, my actual daily OS is Windows.

WSL2 has made this very convenient, hopefully they fix ipv6 soon.

We pay over a billion dollars a year for the CBC.
They have hundreds of millions in handouts for other friendly media.

News is far from free.

This was the intended consequence.
Charge big companies for sharing links, big companies stop sharing links, government gives billions in handouts to friendly media, while starving unfriendly media of revenue and views.

I was going to say this.
Debian provides a great core.
If you want your own flavour, just add your own apt source.

Also being free, it is easy to create derivatives, it seems debian derivatives are quite popular.

I switched to debian in the 90s, it just works.

I am happy with namecheap.
But I just have a few cnames, and email forwarding.