ok so we will correct the wording to reiterate the statement.

"Illegally taken" What the court decided was the way in which trump implemented the tariffs was illegal.
All of the other words you used to justify it and re apply it are incorrect. Do the thing the legally correct way or it is illegal.

When was the last time wall street had mass layoffs?
How come every idea they come up with makes them tons of money and their investors take the hit?
All of those ideas 10 years later are looked at and decided that is not ethical so maybe we should make a law saying you can't do it.
Then the SEC says you can't make laws.
and around and around we go.

Now go convince the management.
They will sell out their best and brightest for short term gains, collect a golden parachute then do it again at the next company.

It is the only job I know of that you are hired to enforce what you don't know or understand.
Remember the lawyer (DA) is the one who knows the laws, the police guess and figure if it affects their authority then it is illegal.

Wait a second, so the pretense was they are "which authorities were investigating for their connection to arson, vandalism and doxing"

And the charges were dropped meaning they had done none of these things at all not even a little bit of connection (or they would have prosecuted). And we are looking at proton mail or self hosting or paying for the site as the issue?
Have we really started missing the real issue?

I noticed this line.
"and to enter special electricity rate agreements with utilities"
so when am I allowed to enter special rate agreements, that I am willing to bet a lot, that they will be lower than consumer rates.

The usa tried this going with the daylight savings time instead of standard time.
It lasted 1 year. The outrage was so great they changed it back after 1 year.
Why they didn't just adopt Standard Time is .. well... its congress what do you expect.
Why we can't just keep Standard time year round is absurd to me.

Work hard, bank as much as you can.
Then retire to a different country where you can actually afford:
Rent / Home
Medical Treatment
Internet
Car
Cell phone plan
etc

Even if you say that companies and customers are the victims, in todays WH guess who will get paid.

Wall Street firm goes to an importer and says, youâ(TM)ve now paid $10 million in tariffs. Iâ(TM)ll pay you $2 million right now for the right to collect the refund if courts ever end up deciding the tariffs were illegal. My friend had also heard that one of the most aggressive buyers was Cantor Fitzgerald, the firm until recently headed by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and now run by Lutnickâ(TM)s sons.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/...

Mmmmm the tax was paid when they bought the product. Not on their tax return. So yes anyone who bought just about anything in the last year has been impacted at the higher tax rate (tariffs). That is how they came up with the number.

Can we do facebook next?

anyone else wondering how they found out? Was there a common thread that each AI would follow that allowed KPMG to figure out it was AI written?
Requested Firewall logs? or proxy server logs?
The reason I was wondering is are companies now flagging AI written resumes as not legit while putting the resumes through AI to match candidates?

Why not just pass a law that states this instead of asking if they would like to sign an agreement?

That is cute that you think it will only hold to options.
There goal just like Microsoft is to make buying a car a subscription. Same rules apply as buying one now but you have to also pay 20$ a month or the car is remotely bricked.

The reason this is tied to only AI with hiring instead of all of AI and our personal data is because the law states for lending or hiring purposes.
We would need strong personal privacy laws and that is never going to happen in the USA.