Comment: Re:Not Necessarily Dead (Score 1) 146
I added up all the fuel weight, less than 400 tons. You could be quite close to that exploding, really, less than 500 m and survive.
Okay, so you could survive
Comment: Re:"Linux Command Line Tirckery" HA! (Score 1) 633
Comment: Pirate buys boat? (Score 1) 334
And as long as there are pirates sailing the high seas, *someone* will be there to sell them boats.
And here I thought pirates just took the boats
Comment: Re:if you were stuck in Iran.. (Score 1) 147
but I've known two people who went there who said they were welcomed very warmly as Americans and that quality of life there was pretty much the same as any European country.
I'm pretty sure things have changed in Europe since your ancestors emigrated 200 years ago
</flamebait> if by "any European country" you mean the only poor former east block countries, then maybe you're right... Assuming you don't care about human rights.
Comment: Dont worry (Score 3, Funny) 128
Comment: Re:Act of War (Score 1) 263
Which means that, per capita, we don't consume that much less than the Americans. Makes sense - both big countries with large distances to cover.
I don't think it's the large areas, but lack of proper energy taxes to encourage smaller cars and better fuel efficiency. In Europe you typically pay twice as much for gas as in the US, due to responsible energy taxes.
Comment: Re:Bad for the open source community and for softw (Score 1) 90
... It must be much simpler to maintain one code base and then at release time rip out any parts you do not want to release as part of the open source version.
They're not maintaining a closed code repository, Qt LGPL version is hosted on gitorious. In fact they're moving towards some sort of open governance. So if they do have any significant commercial only features, they have to maintain that in a private git repository some where else.
Comment: It's not like tv ads (Score 5, Informative) 170
Also ads elsewhere are not posted without consent, the spam comment that show up on my blog are not ads placed with my consent (Note I have spam filter and personally reviews everything it doesn't kill).
It's equivalent to a people just putting ad-posters on your wall without your consent.
Furthermore it is the biggest threat to the free internet today, to some extent outright destroying the internet as we know it.
Evil is a strong word, but it's capitalization with total disregard for other peoples property and misleading to the degree that it's outright criminal.
Comment: Google is close to defacto monopoly (Score 1) 644
The best solution would obviously be an entirely free software search engine, but I'm not familiar with one, so looking at commercial alternatives to Google makes sense.