Comment: Re:Account security (Score 2) 186
Comment: What crime? What misdeeds? (Score 4, Insightful) 123
Comment: Re:Probably because it makes it more complicated. (Score 1) 324
Comment: Re:Men vs. Women (Score 1) 432
Comment: Re:Two routers (Score 1) 520
Comment: Perfect security is not the point (Score 1) 520
Trying to secure something by decreasing your signal strength is an excellent way to be more secure. It's just not a way to be absolutely secure, as AliasMarlowe seems to think. Even if he cannot detect a signal outside the property, someone with an ultra-high-gain antenna could. Having said that, minimizing the RF signal leakage, hiding the SSID, and MAC restrictions are all steps that increase security by making interception more difficult, even if none of them produce an absolutely secure system.
Saying that these steps for wireless security are useless because they can be breached with enough effort is like saying that locking your doors is useless because the locks can be broken with enough effort. The point is not to achieve perfect security, but security that is good enough to deter the intruders.