Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Only good guys should shoot guns (Score 1) 935

The regulation, as I understand it, would try to keep (functional) guns from bad guys.
Will it succeed 100%? No. Can it? No. But even 1% (less deaths) would be huge improvement, right?

As I am a foreigner, I probably should not give advice, but as an egoistic asshole I still give:
1: Remove the right to own guns from everybody. Give it back to those who register their guns. (get a better wording for same effect as this would never pass)
2: Penalise people who mishandle their guns (store/carry inappropriately, etc.) by revokin their gun permits. Or more. (ref: kid who shot neighbor kid: the owner of the gun should be severely penalized, IMHO).
3: Guns can (legally) be sold only to persons with a permit (for that particular gun). There needs to be easy and relatively cheap way to get the permit. "Bad" guys don't get one.

Something like this works, to a degree, in EU. It is by far not perfect, but better than nothing.

Comment Re:Conspicuously missing from TFA... (Score 1) 292

Worst, there is no "education for women must be provided".
Why that? It is the only known (working) way to decrease number of child per female (and decrease human aspect to warming).

Obviously it might make sense to educate males too. But then, are they capable of learning? Does not seem like. I havn't.

Comment Re:Lad balancing? (Score 2) 153

Bloody hell, back here (Finland) they advertise netflix-like services for tablets. Slogan goes "you can watch what ever you like where ever you like, when ever you like" and the picture shows a mobile phone and tablet. But then, they do not limit 4G in any way.
Not that I mind some cap, but 23G is smallish (less than a movie per day).

Comment Re: Profiting on the Backs of Others (Score 1) 457

I disagree. I think it is obvious Google picked Java because it was popular. They could have made it compatible, but on purpose did not. So in effect they did pull developers from Java platform.
If Google did not want to do that, they would not have used Java, but made a better language. A better language closer to modern scripting languages (e.g. no "generics") and more sane arithmetic (integers which cannot overflow, not require sin(x) return exactly[1] same result in every platform with every argument, etc.).

[1] I do not remember what the Java requirements are, but they are silly for this kind of a language. IMHO sin(10^50) is pretty much "implementation defined" as sin(10^50 + epsilon) is in effect random. Sure there are cases where you really have to do "infinitely precise" arithmetic to calculate sin(huge_value), but for generic computation? No.

Comment Re:Colorado sure has nice beaches (Score 1) 940

Are you really claiming 1% of the rich could not buy all the houses (i.e. land), even if you government would give permits "everywhere"?

Tell me one reason why the rich would not buy all the property, even if there is (un)reasonable amount. That way they can control the people thus ensuring they always get a bigger slice.

I think this is the next phase on the "fewer owning more and more": you'd be better of being a slave than having a job & rent.

Comment Re:Hmm (Score 1) 892

They only want "this" person for the top positions (board, ceo, etc), and they they give such a huge offer that there is no need to negotiate. Or if there is, they just make a new, bigger one.

Honestly, recruiting talent is not difficult, finding talent is. Sticking to "this person" is stupid, nobody is irreplaceable, at least not after "being hit by a bus".

Slashdot Top Deals

Wernher von Braun settled for a V-2 when he coulda had a V-8.