It *could* be gibberish, but who knows? Maybe I reveal the secret to unlimited wealth in it. Of course, I might encode something that nifty using an OTP...
Reminds me of something from one of them Steve Jackson
gamebook (or whatever the crap they were called) things
I read when I was about 12. The preponderance of j's in
particular. I don't quite remember how that code
worked though, just something about shifting vowels. And
IIRC the initials of each word were special somehow...
Damnit, I'm going to have to go find the stupid thing
now... <some time later>...Aha! Found the one in question.
<reacquaints self with cypher>...
Oy. You're going to kill me. FortKnox [slashdot.org] was right, it's best to avoid this one. I had no idea anyone would spend that much time on it. It's actually, torturously, completely random.
Whoah, random as in a really incredibly obscure cypher, or... just a completely random string of letters?
I'm actually quite surprised to find myself laughing at this!
Well, as I said in my
Journal just earlier [slashdot.org], at least I've got some semi-useful
scripts in the process.
Heh (Score:2)
If its encrypted or just letters shifted I may play with figuring it out, but knowing it can be gibberish is enough to talk me outta trying
Re:Heh (Score:1)
I'll save you some work, it's not a simple shift (Caesar) cipher...
(output from a quick script)
Re:Heh (Score:1)
icbd, you're a dink.:) (Score:1)
I have work to do and I'm staring at your damn sig and bio looking for patterns on a couple of rxvt's!
Re:icbd, you're a dink.:) (Score:1)
Looks familiar (Score:2)
Reminds me of something from one of them Steve Jackson gamebook (or whatever the crap they were called) things I read when I was about 12. The preponderance of j's in particular. I don't quite remember how that code worked though, just something about shifting vowels. And IIRC the initials of each word were special somehow...
Damnit, I'm going to have to go find the stupid thing now...
<some time later>...Aha! Found the one in question. <reacquaints self with cypher>...
Re:Looks familiar (Score:1)
Sorry
Re:Looks familiar (Score:2)
I'm actually quite surprised to find myself laughing at this! Well, as I said in my Journal just earlier [slashdot.org], at least I've got some semi-useful scripts in the process.
So you should be!Re:Looks familiar (Score:1)
a) it's a simple substitution cypher.
b) each letter stands for one and only one other letter.
c) Spaces are important, and in the right places.
That's what I'm working with; my assumptions may be wholly wrong, but I'll work with it this way until it proves utterly futile.
Or I get bored with it, whichever comes first.