Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Test peering (Score 1) 294

I'd like to see a site that's capable of testing the peering throughput of a given ISP. As opposed to running a single speed test, it'd run run multiple tests consecutively via servers on different networks. Take the Verizon fiasco recently where they had a saturated link to Level 3 that affected Netflix. A peering test would be capable of highlighting this sort of thing.

Comment Re: But... but nucular is bad! (Score 2) 143

Nothing is 100%. Something WILL go wrong. As each day passes without incident the probability of something going wrong increases. I'm all for nuclear power, but, the cost of a nuclear disaster has to be considered. Simply saying we can build it safe means nothing. Something WILL go wrong.

Comment Do the ends justify the means? (Score 1) 828

At what point do you decide that gun related violence and crime outweigh the cost of liberty? The gun related deaths are a necessary evil that come along with having the means to rise up and overthrow an oppressive government. You might say it'll never happen. If history is any indication I'm not willing to gamble.

Comment Re:Congratulations, Verizon (Score 1) 331

I tether often, and I don't notice this on pages loaded on the tethered PC. It must be a forced proxy they have set up in the stock browser?

It doesn't matter if you're using the stock browser or not. In the past you used to be able to switch to a different APN (internet2.voicestream.com, internet3.voicestream.com) and avoid the compression. I've heard that modifying the headers with a Firefox addon get's around the issue but I haven't tried it. I personally connect to my router at home via PPTP on my android to get around the compression. If you're curious if your carrier is molesting your images, download the same image over cellular and wifi and compare the size of the two.

Submission + - Are you thinking of moving to low-power servers?

An anonymous reader writes: PCWorld has a nice piece talking about low-energy server computing, and how the era of traditional high-energy servers, supported by racks of air conditioning, might be coming to an end. What do you think? Could you use a server made from Atom chips, or even ARM chips (bearing in mind Windows is coming to ARM soon)? Has your company looked into it?

"The following is not for the weak of heart or Fundamentalists." -- Dave Barry

Working...