Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Heh... (Score 1) 110

by h4x0t (#48465151) Attached to: The Software Big Oil's PR Firm Uses To "Convert Average Citizens"
Concerning divergent hypotheses on climate change cause:
The article on scientific opinion on climate change (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change) is twice as long as the one for climate change itself. This is mainly because it is a very dear topic that is constantly, erroneously (but effectively) 'discredited' by 'news outlets'. It is very important that the world know, beyond a doubt, that there is a scientific CONSENSUS that climate change is caused by human activity -- specifically the release of CO2 into the atmosphere through combustion of fossil fuels.

Yes the models need to be adjusted, they will be, repeatedly. But it doesn't change the fact that the problem is somewhere between bad and hellish.

Cosmic rays, as the previous comment suggests is an example of a differing hypothesis that may explain the same observations, is the theory that decreased activity from the Sun (sunspots and related activity) decreases the protection provided from solar wind and increases the effect of cosmic rays on the planet (reducing cloud formation/cover). This hypothesis has been calculated to contribute, at maximum, 10% of the change we have observed, and, since this is a cyclic process(the ebb and flow of solar activity) on the order of 11 years, historic data can show the effect during previous cycles*.

*'Cosmic rays, solar activity and the climate',T Sloan and A W Wolfendale, 2013, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 045022
Also Check http://www.skepticalscience.co... for this topic.

-h4x0t

Comment: Re:A clear pattern (Score 1) 71

by h4x0t (#48456061) Attached to: DHS Set To Destroy "Einstein" Surveillance Records
The system is broken.

It has been for a long time.

I've used to dream of leaving and not looking back and I have the means, but where would that leave this place?
Down one educated individual.
Down one tax payer.

I have no idea what to do.

I could fight it. I could spend my whole life fighting it. To what end?
I do not want power. I just want the power that exists to not be abused.

Could some scientist/engineer out there run on that platform? You'd have my vote.

Send out mailers to your constituents with randomized logins to your polling web-site. Do what they say. Post the results. Keep public records. Be accountable. Only for 1 or max 2 terms, and then go back to your day job. Please.

Comment: Re:Heh... (Score 1) 110

by h4x0t (#48424349) Attached to: The Software Big Oil's PR Firm Uses To "Convert Average Citizens"
There is a scientific consensus on the topic, so one could see why it may appear like a 'pushed' agenda. Scientists are not easily swayed by adverts on TV, radio, disagreeable slashdotters, etc.. They come to conclusions by looking at data (try it, there's a fuck ton on climate science), examining their methods, examining the conclusions drawn from the data sets, verifying that other experiments of a similar nature present data that agrees or disagrees.

And you know what? They keep looking for more data. They may even set up their own experiments. They are smart mother fuckers that love to know how the world works, their effect on it, and their place in it. They also enjoy finding out new things. So if they run a test and the results disagree with the current body of data, they present it all over the place, and they have their methods examined, their testing redone, and they are either shown to be right or wrong.... eventually. Hell, if they are right about something major, we give them a million bucks and a medal!

Currently, there is a 97% consensus among climate scientists that not only is the climate changing dramatically, but humans are the likely cause via the burning of fossil fuels.
-h4x0t

When you start your research, it would be prudent to start at NOAA before BP, as sometimes conflicts of interest exist -- even in science. Something something money.

Comment: Re:I bet Slashdot knows better than any engineer.. (Score 1) 523

by h4x0t (#48424231) Attached to: What Would Have Happened If Philae Were Nuclear Powered?
Even were someone a certified expert, they probably haven't worked on the project, and even if they had, they probably don't know the whole of it (budgets, constraints, etc) and even if they did, they probably wouldn't be sitting on slashdot second guessing multi-billion euro projects. Think.

"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts." -- John Wooden

Working...