This can be done with user space threads

long long int existed as for quite some time, gcc and msvc support in on 32 bit platforms.

And yet in Germany wind power provided 9.9% of the total energy consumption in 2011, in some states in the north more then 40% of the consumed power was wind power. And as you can see here, the combination of wind and solar power is a good idea: when there is more sun there tends to be less wind, and when there is more wind, usually you have less sun.

If there is evidence, there wouldn't be any reason to believe, or like Douglas Adams put it so nicely, God only exists through believe.

Wilful blindness is actually what religion is all about, because it can be used to execute power over people.

The wrong link in the summary should be http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669034

In case you didn't RTFS: The laptop was bricked by using a program running on Windows.

There, FTFY.

Well, there's s always the CRAPL license that was made for exactly this kind of source code release, and IMNSHO publishing the source code with the paper should be a must, because it's only science if it is reproducible. I work in image processing and more often then not, papers are missing parameters, the description of the implementation is ambiguous, and as a result just reproducing the result of such a paper is impossible without contacting the authors. (The data used is yet another story.) I do not care if the code is production ready of if I would have to rewrite it from scratch, if at least could have a look at the tweaks that are not in the paper because the authors didn't deem them important enough and the reviewers didn't notes that the published algorithms are not really reproducible - or worse, the reviewers told the authors that "these are standard filters, so there is no need to publish the parameters".

Well, just look at a map, and one can clearly see that a cable to Florida would have made a lot more sense than the cable to Venezuela. There is. in fact, an undersea cable running like 20km off-shore off the northern Cuban cost, but because of the embargo, Cuba was not allowed to connect to it. Hence until now, at least the state of the Cuban Internet connection had a lot to do with the embargo. And Internet connection nowadays means business.

So far I've only seen Pina in 3D, but with this flick it was really great. I think that it is one of the movies that really gained from the technology. Still, at times it was annoying that you have to look more or less exactly where the director wants you to look, because otherwise its out of focus.

Unfortunately, all the things AC wrote are indeed happening.

No, because they have only to comply with one of the three clauses (a), (b), or (c), and even if they choose (b), they only have to provide the written offer to the receiver of the binary, notwithstanding that the actual offer must be valid for any third party (thereby making 3(c) possible).

WRONG: Firstly, they may distribute the source code alongside with the binary (see 3(a)), and if they choose 3(b), the offer has to be valid for any third party, but they only have to give it to the person who receives the binary. This person could then decide to post the offer on the Internet.

Also wrong, they can charge all they want for the binary, because only when you receive the binary you are legally entitled to also get the source code. In other words, at least one person must pay the guys, and this person can then redistribute the binary and the source code gratis.

Because AC is right.

The GPL clearly states that you may redistribute the binary provided that one of the three options 3(a-c) is fulfilled. Clearly, choosing (a) and redistributing the source code alongside with the binary is enough to comply with the GPL.. Redistributing by means of 3(c) can only be offered by someone who got the offered the source code by means of 3(b).

How so? Unless someone who bought the binary comments on this topic, we don't know.