Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yeah, pretty much. (Score -1) 114

You're not going through them anyway. It's too late to make any impact now. Demographics have been in decline for decades, and it's only getting worse because the buying power of the average euro citizen is getting lower and lower. Having kids is a luxury most people cannot afford. Some decades ago, people would delay and delay the conception of the first child in order to enjoy life more. Then it became almost mandatory (especially for women) because of work pressure: you becoming a mother would mean at one time no more career option, then immediate layoff. It got so bad in many countries that one living wage was simpy not enough to pay the bills, so married couple waited and waited until it was too late. At this point in european history, having kids is unaffordable.

Now it gets worse: retirement is based on what is basically a pyramid scheme. When it was thought up it was wildly believed that each next generation would be as numerous or more than the preceding one, and it would earn more. The opposite happened. Now it's a nightmare scenario, with the boomers retiring and not enough money to pay their pensions. Add to this that automation has taken away most entry-level and low-skill jobs, even while euro governments thought they could make up the population deficit through immigration.

Well, it turns out most of the immigrants can't take those jobs or won't take them. We have now generations of radicalized folks who can't wait to jihad on your face, and they will. At this moment, the only countries in the EU that have retained some sanity are the former east bloc ones, but one wonders if it will be enough once the former west falls.

Comment Re:Impressive attention to detail (Score -1) 58

Your head is wrong, so wrong it should be removed and replaced with a cabbage. It's a movie. A movie. Fiction. Nothing else. There is no need to rationalize a choice dictated by then current technology. If anything, flat screens would be easier to replace: less bulky, you can stock more into a spare parts container. Use less power. But they didn't have them in 1979 (though Kubrick did have flat screens in "2001"). Why spend brain processing power pulling out excuses for design choices that do not need any, when you clearly have so little to spare?

Comment Why, iLife, why? (Score -1) 123

Why are you so interested in my dust and stuff, hunh? Are you fetishists? Do you get a hard-on when looking at garbage bags? Are you aroused by the thoughts of dirt, loose hairs and crumbs? Can't get it up with your favourite mentally impaired intersex prostitute of questionable age without thinking other people's dirty floors? I'm not judging you, I'm merely curious. Do you fantasize about being a mite?

Comment Re:GCR (Score 0) 57

Why "someone" should spend time and effort on this? If you believe it's really important, do it yourself or hire and pay someone to do it, then market the product. Or are you suggesting someone should spend their own without compensation so you can simply use the result of their effort for free, hunh? Is that the reason, you fidelcastroated madurosturbator commie tick?

Comment Re:Sucks for nerds (Score 0) 44

Nerds aren't being bullied. In fact, nerds are some of the worst bullies ever: they usually pick on smaller kids - often preying on primary school age children - because against any larger opponent they would be torn to pieces. No wonder nerds grow up to be child molesters. What we do to bullies is called a social hygiene operation: we exclude them from society and beat them up in order to enforce their emargination. We don't want those sickos among us. So, we're not bullying them, we're pushing them to the side and away from the Beautiful People.

Comment Re:Question is (Score -1) 162

Or that it's simply as dumb as a brick and would be better off being used as one. Kids are like all other people: some are more or less functioning, a few are intelligent, a very rare few are brilliant, the rest are bricks of dried shit. This is a reality of life, but parents can't accept that their precious little snowflake could be any less than this century's great genius. Once upon a time they would insist it was "misunderstood" or "simply too far ahead" or an "indigo child". Now they're all assburgers.

I wish teachers (those who are worth their salt, and those are in diminishing numbers) would grow a pair and tell the chopparents: "See, your kid is so useless it ought to be recycled as pet food. It's not brilliant, it's not a genius, it's a shit windowlicker. Or rather it would be if it could tell a window from anything else. That's how stupid your shit kid is. Did you try to abort it by any chance?"

Yes, that's the sorry situation. Chopparents who can't accept their subpar progeny is two IQ points too low to be yoghurt so they try to pass them off as smart windowlickers. Guess what: windowlickers aren't smart, or they wouldn't be windowlickers.

Comment Re: IEEE 802.11ac-2013?! (Score 0) 70

Kids have never been interested in that. The hobbyist computer scene died before 1995, the era lasted from about 1975 (the Altair) to the early 1990s (Amiga, Atari ST). Raspies should have been used in robotics (too fragile) or any project that required a working multipurpose computer. So far, the only thing they have been good for has been for emulators, and even that as a curiosity. For field data-gathering they're worthless, even in the best enclosures they can't stand outdoors temperatures and humidity. You can make a NAS out of a raspie, an USB powered port multiplier and some HDDs or SSDs, but why bother? It's totally unreliable and slow.

They're toys, and expensive as that. You don't learn anything from them. You can't use them for anything even remotely serious.

Comment Re:I am rooting for Blue Origin now. (Score 0) 31

Of course two billionaires competing against each other is better than one. What does one billionaire competing against himself look like? "Whoo-ha! I beat myself! Wheee! I'm so much fucking better than myself! That me sucks! Yeah!"

Seriously, loserboy, are you that fucking stupid or did you have to work on it? Why are you projecting your own inadequacies onto everybody? We all know you were playing against yourself in the chess club and still managed to lose each and every fucking time, but the rest of humanity is now a lowlife jerkoffer like you.

Comment Good idea (Score 0) 184

Working off computah weirdos to their deaths appeals to me. Nobody likes them geeks. The ladies despise them because they're ugly, repellent, smelly molesters who should be thrown onto a dumpster fire, and the fellow men hate them because they're repulsive zit-faced loud imbeciles who yak endlessly about crap nobody is interested in.

I have spent some years downsizing and rationalizing expenses in firms all over Europe and each and every time the IT shit nerds were escorted out of the building by security, everybody cheered. Everybody. That's how much computah weirdos are despised. Not just disliked: despised. You're not even hated, you're shit accidentally stepped upon, cockroaches in the kitchen.

So 996 is a good idea. Work you hard until you die, so that the cleaning crew can toss your stinking carcasses onto the garbage heap where you belong. Nobody will miss you, not even your own families who disowned you after all that CP was found on your hard drives.

Comment Re:DJI spy campaign? (Score 0) 47

They're simply cheap and good quality and they interface with devices like the Pocket 3, which is an outstanding piece of hardware if you're into indie moviemaking, vlogging and the like. I personally use the Röde mikes but to each their own.

Oh by the way nerds... Kill yourselves. Seriously. Nobody likes you. You're better off dead and the world is better off without you.

Slashdot Top Deals

In practice, failures in system development, like unemployment in Russia, happens a lot despite official propaganda to the contrary. -- Paul Licker

Working...