Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Uh? (Score 1) 298

It's strictly about the number of transistors on a chip.

This.

Just because clock speeds won't go up much more with silicon technology, it doesn't mean that going from a 2D plane to 3D assemblies (with the associated heat problems, but this "low power" stuff helps with that) won't happen.

It will happen. It's "merely" an engineering and geometry problem rather than a physics problem requiring new science.

--
BMO

Comment Re:The Republicans are destroying our lives (Score 5, Insightful) 178

Right, because an international agreement negotiated by a Democratic administration is some hope to be blamed on the Republican party.

Pull your head out of your ass. The Establishment is the problem, If you are remotely considering voting for HRC or Rubio, THIS IS YOUR FAULT.

Vote Sanders, or Vote Cruz as you like but do not allow HRC or Rubio to get nominated!

Comment Re:legalism is a crap philosophy. (Score 1) 559

I live out in the middle of no where but Cville might be the nearest big city. I aggressively avoid going there because driving and parking is SO PAINFUL. It has to be the worst place I have ever driven a car. I mean driving in Boston is easier!

I can't describe the layout of streets in Cville as anything other than "aggressively stupid". Now add all the UVA students who are typical distracted, intoxicated, or stopping in completely random places for people to jump in or out of the cars and its the stuff of nightmares. There are few "main" roads other than US250 and US29 that go across town, so pretty much all travel is on "neighborhood streets". It does not surprise me that people are injured and even frequently. Speed isn't really the problem. Quite honestly I am terrified the entire time driving around there. Even crawling at 25mph anyone could step out from between two parked cars that you could not see with enough time to stop.

What Cville needs isn't speed limits and speed traps, its already got plenty (cops there are actually quite aggressive compared to most places IMHO, the professors experience not withstanding), it needs mirrors on polls so you can see around corners and over parked cars. It also seriously needs to demo some building and put in more off street parking, so it can disallow parking on the busier streets.

Comment Re:Censors must have been delighted (Score 1) 255

True but if you are looking to cause their down fall you stick a few single frames of the old goatse.cx somewhere in the middle. If you still get your 'G' or whatever 'appropriate for children' rating the BBC gives, you got a major scandal, "see see the censor's don't even really do their job its just a cash grab!"

Wost case its just as effective a DOS as this was anyway.

Comment Re:Mdsolar strikes again with unrealistic FUD (Score 1) 346

Pfft, I like my artisanal coal fired steam turbine generated electricity. The nuclear steam turbine stuff is alright for an everyday fix though. I'll even indulge in that bottom shelf hydro-electric stuff once in a while when money is tight.

The photovoltaic and wind turbine stuff though is rot-gut, nobody should have to suffer with that. The just don't bulbs don't glow right.

Comment Re:So why the secrecy (Score 2) 171

it violates the freedom of association by imposing warrantless surveillance.

I am pretty strong strict constructionist who is also willing to read in some implicit rights where I feel they are necessary to exercise the other explicit rights. The 9th amendment exists to support that interpretive action.

For examples, if I were a SCOTUS justice I would hold that the various travel restrictions like the no-fly list are unconstitutional because there is no due process around who is on the list. We have an explicit right to association and assembly in the first amendment. One must be able to go to where the assembly is taking place, if air travel is the only reasonably way to get there due to say time constraints, the government cannot prevent a citizen from traveling by air, without due process of law.

I find your argument that surveillance violates the freedom of association however. They government clearly is denied the power to prevent you from associating, but I don't see any explicit right to associated in secret. An association is not an effect, and while it might involve your person being present or not, it does not require the violation of your person to observe it. So I am struggling to find an implied privacy right here using the fourth amendment.

I am not sure there is a constitutional issue here. I do think there is a violation of law taking place however. Essentially you have a contract with the cellular carrier to interface your equipment with their own. These devices misrepresent the LEA as the carrier to your device. I don't see how this is any less fraudulent than if an officer arrived at your home dressed as gas company employee and professing to be from the gas company investigating an issue, and subsequently made the argument that you could be prosecuted for the contraband discovered in your home based on the fact that he was invited in and therefore did not require a warrant.

Plain clothes cops are one thing but to me these devices cross a line in that they are actively misrepresenting what/who they are. This possibly induces you to do things that might be materially against your interest like self incrimination. This is a form for fraud.

Comment The mind of the leftist (Score -1, Offtopic) 171

Remember kids, we have regulate every financial transaction out there because you can't be expected to read and understand a contract in plain language. Nope if you want to take out a short term loan at a high rate of interest or something you are a victim. On the other hand surely you can be expected to reach abstract conclusions about the behavior of cell phones and cellular networks by observation of advertising and the existence of various location aware apps. If you can't be expected to make decisions about your privacy based on that well tough beans.

Comment Re:Distinctions (Score 1, Insightful) 166

Why should somebody in the STATE govenment be locked up?

Because the liberal biased media, Obama, and the Clinton campaign want to blame those nasty Republicans in the state house for poisoning Flint's poor black population. That is pretty much the reason. Yes the water pipe corrosion happened because the emergency manager a state official made decisions to use a chemically different water source, to save money. That person did this without understanding the potential consequences.

Quite honestly this is clear argument for the IMPORTANCE of HOME RULE, when you let some big far away central government make decisions about local matters these are types of results you get, no matter what party that far away official belongs too. So really we are left with the question of why did Flint not have home rule on the matter, and the reason for that is because the left leaning local politicians had screwed things up so bad their fellow state citizens were stuck bailing them out! Essentially the people of Flint and their elected officials would have been unable to keep the lights on or the water running left to their own devices due to years of mismanagement. If not for the state government a little lead in the water would be the least of their problems. So I don't feel especially sorry for them. This is ultimately a disaster of their own make.

Comment Re:You want to cheat on your wife? (Score 1) 228

Putting aside the underlying puritanical bullshit, who broke the law here? Yes, that's right, the hackers and the extortionists. Wah wah wah, people have affairs and they'e evil people .. such moralizing bullshit. Neither Ashley Madison nor the people using the site broke any laws.

That isn't true, depending on what state you live in! Adultery is absolutely a crime in Virgina and probably other states. It should be a crime everywhere. If you are committing adultery and you are violating your marriage contract. At least if you spouse is ignorant of this its likely they are investing in the partnership in ways that would be against their interest if the marriage isn't sustainable. If they were aware of your misbehavior and would stop doing that in light of it you have induced them to act against their own interest by misrepresentation. That is basically the text book definition of FRAUD.

We don't tolerate legally or societal fraud elsewhere there is no justifiable reason it should be tolerated with regard to marriage. The reason it is tolerated is because progressives hate the idea of the family unit. Its a little to autonomous and independent for them so they do what they can break it down including stacking the legal framework against it.

Comment Re: You want to cheat on your wife? (Score 2, Insightful) 228

At least here in Virgina adultery is still in fact a crime, though rarely prosecuted unfortunately. As it should be, because I does in fact harm society at large and the party who is cheated on is essentially being defrauded with regard to their marriage contract.

Personally I would like to see the state go after some of the AM users whose actual cheating can otherwise be corroborated. I think it would send a good message, and the fine is $250 bucks so its not ruin anyone. Sadly it wont happen since the lefties captured the governors office.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Why should we subsidize intellectual curiosity?" -Ronald Reagan

Working...