
Journal eugene ts wong's Journal: "eugene ts *wrong*" is not "eugene ts *wong*" 23
There is a fool with the user name, "eugene ts wrong" & is pretending to be me. If he says anything offensive, look @ the user number & check for the blue & green dots. Looking @ my fans & friends list will also give you an idea of whether or not it is really me.
So, in short, don't get offended @ me if he says something harsh & negative.
If you still don't believe me, you can see the list of replies for yourself.
Ah but... (Score:1)
You have your very own slashdot impersonator. Cool! :-)
Re:Ah but... (Score:1)
Re:Ah but... (Score:1)
Nobody thinks I'm worth impersonating. *sniff* I guess, that I just didn't step on enough toes. We'll try out best, eh, gmhowell? ;-)
Re:Ah but... (Score:1)
Re:Ah but... (Score:1)
I'm going to befriend you at once.
What are you going to do when I change my signature?
Re:Ah but... (Score:1)
Re:Ah but... (Score:1)
Having a troll account is quite fun. Corporate Troll started out as one, and I think he is quite useful once in a while. Even Trolls can get a Karma=Excellent, if you don't post too much stupid things.
Oh, and I love the sig! It's really what Christine would have said...;-)
Re:Ah but... (Score:2)
At first I read that as "Irritation."
*snicker* (Score:2)
Re:*snicker* (Score:1)
I get it. (Score:2)
Enjoy the flattery.
Re:I get it. (Score:1)
No fear (Score:2)
Re:No fear (Score:1)
whatever (Score:1)
there's a great feature on slashdot that lets you effectively downmod people you don't like as long as you log in. if that person used it, he wouldn't have to reply to you. it would save him a lot of unrest.
i don't agree with you all the time. whatever. most people don't agree with each other all of the time. you're very serious, but to me it's just "part of your charm." this joker chasing you around would enjoy life a lot more if he just ignor
Signature (Score:1)
Re:Signature (Score:1)
I did notice today... (Score:2)
Re:I did notice today... (Score:1)
wrong's journal (Score:2)
Re:wrong's journal (Score:1)
It also makes a good test case for our interpretive skills. In other words, how do we interpret the information available to us? Which of the users is telling the truth [or the most reliable truth]?
If we were to get philosophical, we would ask, "How do we know that Mr. wRong & Mr. wong are actually controlled by seperate users?". Philosophically speaking, I don't think