Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Operate them like a truck stop or filling stati (Score 2) 162

People will need a public EV charger while traveling far from home. That means they will likely arrive there after hours of driving, and so in need of a restroom, a beverage, perhaps a snack or even a quick light meal, and a place they feel generally safe and comfortable to sit with a drink, a snack, a map, or just their thoughts for a few minutes. This is especially true if it can take 20 to 40 minutes for enough of a recharge to make it to the next stop.

We have such things for hydrocarbon burners, and they can be called various things. Truck stop. Filling station. Oasis (which might be a Midwest thing). They all share features besides just a fuel pump. There's going to be a building with a person inside to offer assistance if necessary (apparently a requirement in the ADA) and take payment if paying with cash or there's an issue with the payment system at the pump. Inside that building is also likely to be public restrooms, food and drinks, maybe even hot food and drinks as well as a place to sit to eat. These are often convenient places to shop while pulled off the road for fuel, which is why they are sometimes called a convenience store.

The problem I see is one of scale. The places you describe often have 30+ gas pumps, and around here, we have Bucee's that have about 100 - with usually 95%+ in use during peak times. You need 5-10x as many chargers to keep the same car throughput, so you're looking at 150-1000 charging stations. At 300kW each, that's 45-300MW of electric service for one business. Not only do you need 10x the real estate, you need room for a pretty sizeable substation, and access to pretty hefty power lines (probably 200-300kV, from some cursory research).

Comment Re:They will panic... (Score 1) 59

They are purposefully imploding their customer base. The goal is to squeeze every customer that cannot move off of vSphere like a lemon in a hydraulic press. They actually do not give a fuck if you migrate to another platform, because they'd rather have 10x the revenue from their captive big fish than worry about the small fish or the ones that got away.

The problem with that plan is that collectively, those companies have a lot of resources to develop other solutions. It's only a matter of time before they form an industry group that duplicates VMWare with open-source tools, that's just as easy to use. Someone will also sell support for it. At that point, VMWare as a platform is done.

I suppose it's possible that Broadcom sees that happening anyway, and is just trying to squeeze as much out of it as possible before then.

Comment Re:I'm old enough to remember (Score 1) 69

Cleaning bugs off my car windshield periodically. That doesn't happen anymore because those bugs are dead and gone permanently.

I'm sure that's fine and I'm sure we can focus on important issues like woke and trans instead of part of our entire food chain collapsing... Ain't moral panics fun?

I think this is also due to cars becoming more aerodynamic for fuel efficiency. My newer cars will get bugs on the flatter areas of the front, but rarely the windshield anymore, unless it's a particularly large one that the slipstream can't get out of the way fast enough.

Comment Use the ADA! (Score 2) 127

I'm mildly autistic, with an official diagnosis. This is considered a disability under the ADA, and thus employers must provide reasonable accommodation.

My employer recently started requiring everyone within 50 miles of an office to come in 2x/week, but the offices are all high-density shared workspaces - a nightmare for anyone on the spectrum. I talked to my manager, he talked to HR, and surprise, surprise, the most logical accommodation was to continue to work from home full time.

If there's one thing HR is terrified of, it's exposing themselves to lawsuits stemming from discrimination or disabilities, so use that to your advantage!

Comment Re:What "aggressive strategy"? (Score 1) 464

Trade imbalances aren't (necessarily) bad and requiring "balanced trade" isn't (necessarily) practical. For example, the administration complained that the U.S. can't sell rice to the Asian markets -- (to quote The Daily Show) well, duh, they mastered growing rice 10,000 years ago. Now maybe if it's the "a-Roni" variety ... Other countries can't help it if they have things the U.S. wants but the U.S. doesn't have anything they want.

The thing is, in a global economy, you can't just look at two parties and call it a trade imbalance. It's like Trump has forgotten why currency was invented.
I want to buy WidgetA from Mr. A, but I don't have the WidgetB he's looking for, which only Mr. B has. Mr. B doesn't want WidgetA - he wants WidgetC. And so on around the world until you get to Mr. Zed, who wants my widget, but doesn't have the WidgetA that I want.

So either every transaction requires orchestrating a complex, multi-party barter, or I just give Mr A 10 clams for his widget, he uses them to get Mr B's widget, and so on until I get the 10 clams backs from Mr. Zed. No trade imbalance at all, unless you're so shortsighted as to only look at Mr. A and Zed.

Comment Re:Oh no, the poor credit companies. (Score 2) 163

A 10% cap on interest means only the wealthy and folks with credit scores north of 750 will get a credit card. Not necessarily bad, but I can see folks bitching about how the poor are being frozen out of credit markets.

Or the cards for people with low credit will just charge annual fees instead. Which is actually worse - at least you can normally avoid the interest by keeping it paid off, but you can't avoid the fees.

The only thing that we know for sure is that the companies won't accept at hit to their profits.

Comment Re:Chicken vs. Egg (Score 1) 275

Ignoring the "10,000 mile trip" silliness, that's not a relevant question. On long trips, the limiting factor is biological, not fuel. If you charge while you eat, etc., what you find is that you very rarely end up waiting for the car, at all

The problem with this is that it doesn't pass the "what if everyone did it" test (or what happens when everyone has an electric car). No restaurant is going to install enough charging stations that a significant percentage (assuming it's along a heavily-traveled-by-long-distance-trippers route) of its patrons can charge at the same time. So what are you going to do? Jump up and dash outside to try to get a charger every time you see someone leave? Leave the car at a charger somewhere else and taxi/uber to your restaurant? Go through a drive-through and eat in your car while camping the chargers until someone leaves?

Comment The real reason for this... (Score 1) 272

is so that you can't use your purchase until you've agreed to some kind of one-sided contract that says you can't sue them, etc.

Appliance companies have tried putting that sort of thing on the boxes, stickers, etc. before, but since they tend to be professionally installed, it's too easy for the end users to claim they never saw/agreed to anything. So enter mandatory phone app/cloud connectivity.

Comment Power infrastructure? (Score 1) 275

Seems like this would be a case of "it's great for one person, but won't work if everyone does it."

Did some searching, and found that utilities start thinking about dedicated substations for customers drawing more than 10-12MW. So basically, anywhere that wants to charge more than a few cars at a time will need insanely expensive electric service. At the 4.5MW standard, that's only 2-3 cars.

Comment Because working from home (Score 2) 39

When I had to go to the office, I'd have to wake up around 0630 to get there around 0830.

Now, WFH, I get an extra hour of sleep AND log in 45 min earlier. Waking up at a more natural time (for me) could probably explain 2% extra productivity by itself.

Starting earlier naturally leads to quitting earlier. I'm guessing there's more than enough people like me these days to move the average.

Slashdot Top Deals

Breadth-first search is the bulldozer of science. -- Randy Goebel

Working...