Let's start with the people who think that there is a planet B that we could move people to. It would increase the average IQ.

Is that song about ICE? Because Spotify is still running especially egregious ads for the American GeStaPo which glamorize turning in hispanic Anne Franks.

We don't need to explore space right now, we need to repair our biosphere.

There's nothing in space that will help us do that in time to actually do it.

If people want to spend their own money doing it that's fine, although then there's a conversation to be had about where that money came from.

It's enough to determine whether a citation even exists, which is what this story is about.

Oh no, acrimony from racists. They would never have been problematic before. You have to put white people in those roles without qualifications or you will upset the racists! Clown.

Wikipedia is still seen as untrustworthy. On some subjects it's fine. On others it ain't. Jimmy is doing crimethink editing on behalf of Israel now.

I'm sorry you didn't follow it, and then felt a need to say so. Which part do you find confusing? The part where it's not actually a deterrent if it's not actually a penalty?

Does the baby not get citizenship? Is the baby killed?

Don't give Kristi Noem ideas! Look what she does to dogs.

Zillionaires on private islands or shady countries will work on this, and rich will want designer babies with double-dee's, 180 IQ's, and tall. Complain all you want, it ain't going away. I'm just the messenger.

That summary at the top of this story is just way too long. I'll have a chatbot break it down and give me the gist.

That's an exaggeration. You can give a LLM access to real things and they can use those real things to verify. I just flatly do not understand why they are not. It wouldn't make them infallible, but it would go a huge way towards improving the situation, and they are clearly not doing it. They could also use non-AI software tools to check up on the AI output. I'd bet that you could even use a plagiarism detection tool for this purpose with little to no modification, but I'd also bet this kind of tool already exists anyway.

It also shows that if the penalty is insufficient then they have no positive effect. A fine that people with a lot of money can easily afford is just a prohibition which only applies to the poor, with a license fee. Look to speeding tickets which scale with income for a fair model.

Yes

I'm not against a human doing it, I just don't get why they're not having the software do it, when it's feasible for it to do it.

What you're saying here is that no one should ever try to remedy the evils of the past.

That's stupid shit.

Fuck that stupid shit.