Comment Re:Substack is trash (Score 1) 28
FWIW, they did say the push notification promoting a Nazi was an error that got debugged. https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...
FWIW, they did say the push notification promoting a Nazi was an error that got debugged. https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...
Isn't this the worst possible outcome?
It probably won't substantially hinder Google. However, will the Firefox deal with Google that's been propping up Firefox all this time still be able to work? Or will Firefox be SOL?
I'm afraid of an ironic result of this being that Chrome becomes that just much more of a monopolistic monoculture as a result of the ruling.
Polyp used to be my least favorite word. I would read or hear it, and it would make me feel just gross.
I think monetize, however, is now my least favorite word.
1990s me is very surprised that somebody would have to go out of their way to make sure a word processor ran on their computer without automatically connecting to a network, and without needing a network for full functionality.
Every so often I put myself in the mindset of 1990s me looking at technology today, and what I mostly hear is, "Wow, you have a lot of capability, but WHAT WERE YOU THINKING???"
I'll take oxymorons for $100, Alex.
Many headlines could just be replaced with this.
what kind of behavior would demonstrate that LLMs did have understanding?
An LLM would need to act like an understander -- the essence of the Turing Test. Exactly what that means is a complex question. And it's a necessary but not sufficient condition. But we can easily provide counterexamples where the LLM is clearly not an understander. Like this from the paper:
When prompted with the CoT prefix, the modern LLM Gemini responded: âoeThe United States was established in 1776. 1776 is divisible by 4, but itâ(TM)s not a century year, so itâ(TM)s a leap year. Therefore, the day the US was established was in a normal year.â This response exemplifies a concerning pattern: the model correctly recites the leap year rule and articulates intermediate reasoning steps, yet produces a logically inconsistent conclusion (i.e., asserting 1776 is both a leap year and a normal year).
Is this "during work hours, for the hours you're paid, instead of doing the job you normally do, do some warehouse work"?
Or is it "on top of all your regular work, come and volunteer to do additional unpaid work"?
If the former, then, whatever, this is no big deal.
If the latter, then, damn, Amazon needs to get the hell sued out of it. Not that that would happen in our current world.
I once asked chatgpt to write a sonnet about constipation. I remember being abused by the result.
Mostly, though, I try to avoid the brain atrophe device.
It's all about theta waves. Those who have become "clear" and can harmonize the frequency of their theta are known as operating thetans.
There is a school of thought which holds that past a certain scale, effective moderation becomes impossible. I've done moderation work and it took tons of judgement.
Documentation is the castor oil of programming. Managers know it must be good because the programmers hate it so much.