Ads (Imagine big LCDs on the side of cheeta) on the Battlefield?

Google for Terrorists (face recogniton from autonomous patrolling robots)?

Streetview for patrolling dangerous areas?

Home deliveries (Much better than flying drones)?

Streetview inside shops and stations?

hmm. Which is the reason why it can be only batteries in cars and not batteries alone.

Exactly my opinion. The final article *as it was published* in the Journal can be theirs, if they wish. The preprint version sent to publisher has seen no work from them.

Yeah but if we can put it in the Web 2.0 then its for sure something new.

it's the only way to be sure.....

want to decide when its time to leave. If i suffer a terminal illness which prevents me from taking part in the normal life at all (i.e. mental decay, Alzheimer etc.) and at some point even living by eating on my own wish, i want to have the option of dying in dignity - if possible i want to be able by my own mind to say good bye to my friends and famlily.

The idea that for my last few years tremendous ressources would be used, which could help much better in other parts of the health system, without prviding me with a real participation in life would make me sick. I love my life, and therefore i wish that the decision to end it when it stops being worth living *to me* (and skip religous ideas how suffering shows us how valuable life is).

If its the most interesting game for you, then not doing it would be missing something. But i get (and deeply respect) your opinion.

Nine months is an *extremly short* round trip time in the car industry is a problem does not threaten the safety but involves controllers which probably affect the safety. (imagine fixing this bug, but introducing a side effect which turns the power off at full speed on the Highway)

OTOH it should not have happened at all.

I did 4 years of Postdoc (in Japan). It was fun, in Japan the payment for Postdocs is ok, and i worked in a field i liked to work in since i was 16years old. I contributed to some publications (10 Impact points per year) and did some really nice experiments. To me it felt like playing with the most expensive lego bricks which i ever was allowed to play with. I had the priviledge to see parts of the world which i would not have dramt about when before my masters thesis. I met some interesting, peculiar, and exceptional people (coauthors from ~12 nationalities).

OTOH, it was hard work (>80h per week average, in critical times >400h/month), strange habits, uncertainity, and a lack of decent positions after it.

I got out of it, to a technical consulting company. I earn less than the people who started 10 years younger, but somehow doing a phd/postdoc kept me young and agile. I am now more or less resistant to stress (did not feel it since i started the job), am used to pick up new things at a high pace.

I can only say: i did it, it was fun and broadened my view. My PhD and postdoc thought me that persistence in following something you want to do leads to success. I managed to get rid of my attenton span problems. I quit as postdoc when it stopped being fun and when i did not see decent positions around, i left science. I dont regret having done my postdoc, i did not regret for a single day leaving it.There was a time when a very different path in my life would have been very possible. I proably also would not have regret it.

Remarks: you have to have a compatible partner or risk a series of relationships. IMHO the only point where i really seen from behind could have spent some attention on. I also saw people not being able to handle the pressure. I saw people doing postdocs until they where older than 40 because they became too anxious or to incompetent in other things to leave. I saw people fuckign up their lifes for good. People not good enough to get any decend publicaitons, but valuable in the lab, hoping that the professor who kept them forever in a dependent relationship would give them the life-long position as assitant. I habe seen people growing old faster than they should and people breaking down. I have heard of people becoming so fristrated that they sabbotaged the co-workers experiments.

So my advice is: do it als long as you do it for fun. Dont get addicted.

If it follow the purpose of these devices you should leave them rigged up until they are 18.

Experimentally entanglement is shown most strongly in the form of Bell violations:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_theorem

as e.g.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7263/abs/nature08363.html

did.

A free "Windows Phone App"

I would like that.

Any other thing (Dual-Boot, Choice at start-up, something else messe up, additional cost): Dont like that

That is my opinion, and i would vote for a political party which likes to implement this, but currently the law says otherwise.

Besides the uncertainty associated with only having a single data point, you cite the overall rate for problem in fuel systems, not the rate for problems in fuel systems which were hit by a piece of metal.

Lawyers are also a part of the legal system. While they may work for their clients, they are granted special rights in many crountries, inclusding the US aince they agree to the normal proessional ethics. It is very possible that a lawyer must retain knowledge from the client under specific circumstances. Lawyers are paid by the client for a very specific service. They got access to the licensing condition so that they could judge if these touch their clients interest. while i would liek to see patent swaps/licensing deals more transparent (I would think of a "stock exchange model" for licenses) , i have to recognize that currently these are view as a kind of private contract.