Except that companies and the "upper management" guys are getting richer and richer every decade, whereas the rest of us is getting poorer and poorer.
Learn some history.
I'm not going to bother wasting time with you since most of your argument consists of pathetic name-calling.
Oh fuck off already, it is you who is in denial, you seem to think police don't shoot people and murdering innocent people is ok.
I'm done wasting my time with you.
I'm not arguing for the sake of arguing, I'm pointing out that you're not even MAKING an argument, you're just whining with no context and no facts to back up your "regular basis" type BS remarks. And you don't like being called on it, so you just trot out another vague bit of whiny complaining designed to distract from the fact that you're unable to back up what you say.
Really, lol, you should read what you just wrote. It's pretty meaningless has nothing much to do with the original post.
So, you're willing to lump police in, say, Denmark or the US with, say, the police in China
Do you even have a point here? I linked 3 massacres by police in the US in my original post.
for a protracted bloody firefight (guaranteed to impact more innocent people
Wrong, in a fire-fight civilians don't have to stick around - they have a chance to get away without getting killed. Not so with drones.
Drones are the weapon of cowards without morals.
And how do they know the telemetry hasn't been altered - it might be trivial to do.
Too much choice! Does that ever stop people from buying cars?
Again missing the point that police across the world have opened fire on protesters across the world countless times.
You seem to be arguing just for the sake of arguing and don't even have a good point.
No where in your argument do you explain why it is ok to kill innocent men women and children with remote controlled drones.
It isn't. It's cowardly, the people using the drones are no better than the people they are attempting to kill.
So now it's not the people killing the innocent people who are responsible!!!!!!!!!
What a stupid argument.
At what point did you supply 'authoritative numbers'?
You're completely missing the point, police and military do shoot ordinary people, they have done this countless times.
It's going to take a lot more than small changes across the board to fix our OC2 output, it requires complete changes.
And it's pointless complaining about economic cost when the cost of doing nothing is likely 20 times as much.
People in western countries have gotten used to living lifestyles that are completely unsustainable and worse many have gotten it into their thick heads that they are somehow entitled to these lifestyles like they are royalty or something. Just suggesting that people need to live their lives differently causes them to get angry and spout complete stupid crap and excuses. Humans forget, they are an animal and depend on the rest of the ecosystem to exist.
Shut up you idiot. I don;t need to have 'military experience' to know that killing innocent men women and children is wrong.
And don't give me crap about needing to have military experience to know what is going on in this world, that is bullshit.
The simple fact is that most of the victims of drone attacks are not terrorists they are innocent men women and children so I stand by the points I made.
Long story short:
350 tonnes per second of CO2 being absorbed by the ocean is acidifying it.
If we don't stop 96% of ocean life dies.
Dead life rots. Rotting life in water emits nasty toxic gases.
Also melting permafrost releases giant amounts of methane dwarfing climate warming gasses releases by humans, this causes run-away warming.
Methane clathrates under ocean also melt and release billions more tonnes of methane.
Resulting gases make air unbreathable, humans and 95% of life on earth die.
^none of this stuff is included in IPCC models YET.
Global warming is clearly happening, the permafrost is already melting, the sea is already acidifying. The human species days could well be numbered.