Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Sanity check (Score 4, Informative) 197

by coolsteve (#46990513) Attached to: 7.1 Billion People, 7.1 Billion Mobile Phone Accounts Activated
From the article:

Total active mobile subscriptions or accounts -7.1B (was 6.7B in 2011, growth 6%)
Unique mobile users - 4.5 B (was 4.3B in 2011, growth 5%)
Actual mobile phones in use - 5.4 B (was 5.2B in 2011, growth 4%)

Not quite sure what that means... There are more active subscriptions than actual phones in use? Who is paying for a subscription without having a phone attached?

+ - Nokia tries 'you show me yours, I'll show you mine' for parking data->

Submitted by
vu1986 writes "Nokia Research Center has developed a new system for finding parking spots that rewards users for sharing information on primo spots. It’s a smart approach to a common problem, as users might be more willing to share if they know they’ll get privileged information in return."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Truck "Repellent" System (Score 1) 371

by coolsteve (#33136274) Attached to: The Bus That Rides Above Traffic

That assumption has always been there, and people who ignore traffic laws are already a danger. Sure, there are situations when it's quiet enough on the road that you can safely ignore a few laws, but you need to be able to recognise those situations. When this thing is about, you'd better stick to your lane, or check very carefully before switching.

I've seen lots of times when lots of cars are blocking intersections or ignoring traffic signals. People ignore laws when it's very busy, just as much as when it's quiet. (Or at least it seems that way to me.) People are in a rush, or being impatient, or annoyed at someone, or is tired of being stuck behind the same traffic light for the 5th cycle, etc. I'm just picturing the traffic situation with a bunch of these things in New York City. Or Boston. Or Washington DC. Or Taipei.

Comment: Re:Truck "Repellent" System (Score 1) 371

by coolsteve (#33127978) Attached to: The Bus That Rides Above Traffic
There seems to be a strong assumption that everyone is going to follow traffic laws... (Stay in your lane, obey traffic signals, don't block intersections, etc.) From my experience driving, that's a big assumption. It might be a good idea for them to have a traffic officer on the bus at all times, just to give out tickets to all the annoying people blocking the bus in some stupid manner.

Comment: Re:Plausible? (Score 1) 371

by coolsteve (#33127618) Attached to: The Bus That Rides Above Traffic

Did you see the video? The cars were stopped at a red light when the "bus" turned.

You got me, I have not. (My company firewall blocks all video streaming.) I suppose that having these sync with traffic signals would make my point moot.

I can't imagine coins or shoes being any more of a problem than it is for trams that have been in use for some 150 years by now.

These buses will be running on regular roads (with some modification for the track of course.) The sheer number of people that will be walking alongside/across the path of these buses (I'm assuming) would be much more than alongside/across train tracks.

Comment: Plausible? (Score 1) 371

by coolsteve (#33125284) Attached to: The Bus That Rides Above Traffic

Ok, I've got a couple problems with this... First, if that bus wants to turn left/right, then I'd feel bad for anyone who's underneath that bus at the time. (Or likewise, if it's going straight, and you want to turn left/right while underneath.) Second, people drive like idiots. I can't imagine how much damage a car accident with this thing would do. Third, maintaining the tracks that these things run on has got to be expensive and/or difficult. I can imagine the amount of loose change, or little kid shoes being dropped in those tracks.

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm glad they're thinking outside the box to deal with congestion problems, but I don't think this will work...

Comment: Re:Let the rationalizations begin (Score 1) 1115

by coolsteve (#32873996) Attached to: Has Any Creative Work Failed Because of Piracy?

I write music for a living...I should only get paid for the first copy sold?

I don't think anyone is saying that... Piracy will be around, it always has been, and always will. If you are a very good musical artist, you will make lots of money. (i.e. Taylor Swift.) If you produce a good movie, you will make lots of money (i.e. The Dark Knight.) And by 'good', I don't mean what you think is good, it's what most other people think is good. There are still movies nowadays that make lots of money, there are still musical artists that make lots of money today. Even with all the piracy that's going on. Consumers will pay for what they think is a good value, at whatever price they think is a good price.

Comment: Re:I think there's something to that (Score 1) 1115

by coolsteve (#32873646) Attached to: Has Any Creative Work Failed Because of Piracy?
If I had mod points, I'd mod you up.

I totally agree. In fact, I remember a few years back, I had bought a legitimate copy of Civ III Complete. Well, when I tried to install and run the game, it complained of a SecureROM error. I went back to Best Buy, exchanged my copy with a different copy of Civ III, and it didn't work either. Apparently, they got too enthusiastic with their anti-piracy software, and lost a sale because of it (AND I was trying to do the right thing, buying a legitimate version of the software.) I found out later that there are DRM issues with the game, so I just went without.

Now, if I had just gotten a pirated version of the game, it would've had something I could use.

Comment: Re:..for less than 1 minute (Score 1) 454

by coolsteve (#32497820) Attached to: My laptop's battery's good for roughly ...
I've got he same problem. I've got a Dell Inspiron 6000. It's a bit old and runs Windows XP. I could pretty much power on the PC, and by the time I log in, it'll power off due to running out of charge. From what I've been told, batteries have a certain number of 'cycles'. Use them up, and the battery doesn't hold much of a charge anymore. Unfortunately, most laptops will start recharging the battery when it depletes (on it's own) to below 95%. Then it would start recharging the battery, wasting one of your 'cycles'. I've had much more luck (with one of my older laptops) where I would never plug the battery in (unless I needed to charge it in preparation for a trip.) The battery lasted much longer when I needed it to.

% APL is a natural extension of assembler language programming; ...and is best for educational purposes. -- A. Perlis