Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - 6 month subscription of Pandora One at 46% off. ×

Comment The IRS keeps its hooks in US citizens who leave. (Score 2) 343

I'd also move my operation to Ireland if I could.

What's stopping you?

The US tax code. The US keeps its hooks in its citizens and companies, for decades, if they try to leave, even if they move out and renounce their citizenship.

The US does this to a far greater extent than other countries who generally don't tax their citizens if they're out of the country for more than half a year. (This is where "The Jet Set" came from: Citizens of various non-US countries who had found a way to earn a living that let them split their time among three or more countries every year and avoid enough income tax to live high-on-the-hog, even on an income that otherwise might be middle-class.)

Only really big companies, with armies of lawyers, can find loopholes that let them effectively move out of the US to a lower-taxing alternative. You'll note that TFA is a lament about how one managed to escape, and how the US might "close THIS loophole" to prevent others from using it.

Comment Re:Simple Fix for H1B Visa Problem (Score 1) 55

Simply require that H-1B visa holders must be paid at least the 90th percentile (or 95th if you like) wage for their field.

Plus any amount that the employer would have to pay into a government entitlement program for a US employee that he doesn't need to pay into said program for a foreigner on H1B (or other work visa systems).

It's even fair. If the program is, say, a retirement program that the visiting worker can't benefit from, shouldn't he have the money to buy a replacement for it elsewhere?

Comment Dow makes LOTS of stuff. (Score 1) 482

... by everyone's favorite munitions manufacturer: Dow Chemical.

Dow makes a LOT of chemical stuff. Some of it's useful to the military.

If their Dow Corning partnership-subsidiary hadn't been hammered into bankruptct by a bunch of (later shown to be bogus) suits claiming medial harm from their silicon breast implants, we might have had hybrid cars a couple decades earlier, out of Detroit rather than Japan, using lenticular, glass fiber, super flywheels, rather than batteries, for energy storage.

Comment Yeah, you'd think that ... (Score 1) 107

It's my understanding that when you're committing a crime, the last thing you want to do is break even worse laws that will get you a worse sentence if caught.

Yeah, you'd think that. And some of them actually do think of that.

But many criminals don't think very well, or very far ahead. Not thinking about being caught is common. Not expecting to be seriously inconvenienced if they ARE caught is common also.

Think about it: How is "Send me a bitcoin or your insulin pump will deliver a fatal dose!" different from armed robbery for a fat wallet? "Give me a bunch of money or I shoot you!" And a bunch of them DO shoot - (VERY) often even if they GOT the money.

The threat of law-enforcement escalation for murder doesn't seem to have stopped up-front-and-personal armed robbery. Why should it stop distant-and-anonymous ransomware?

Comment Trying to stop it also has bad history. (Score 1) 570

The problem is that the whole thing lends itself to "wackadoodles". You have an entire system of belief based on nothing but hearsay ... Then people believe this stuff with no evidence for it ... take some part of that "literal truth" and decide that it really means you need to go murder some people.

Unfortunately, trying to stop it also has bad history. Meme-infected people tend to remain meme-infected until death when opposed (because opposition tends to reenforce such memes), and forcible brain-washing normally doesn't work (though it may get them to pretend to have changed their beliefs, in order to make the pain stop or avoid death or mutilation). Meanwhile there's a long history of people infected with OTHER religious memes using governmental power to wipe out the believers in competing religions.

The history of Europe, in the centuries before the framing of the US' Constitution, was full of disastrous religious wars, and many of the religious groups in the Americas were here to escape this. One of the groups was "The Separatists", the (colorfully dressed "Pilgrims" of the Plymouth colony, often conflated with the "Puritans" who settled a bit farther north) who held, as a core belief,the separation of the church and the state (because each would corrupt the other).

This ideal was built into the first Amendment of the Bill of Rights, pushed by many leaders of small religions (who knew that, if the government picked and promoted a church, it was unlikely to be theirs, and the religious wars would start over here). The US federal government (and, though "incorporation", the states and their subdivisions) is prohibited from doing anything, for or against, any specific religion (including dogmatic non-religion).

And Islam was known to the framers. It shows up in their debates, where it is held up as an example of a non-Christian religion for which the same arguments can be made, for and against, as are made with respect to Christian sects.

So tracking people by religion, as religion, is right out, and any such plan would almost certainly be gutted the first time it hits the courts.

If the government wants to go after the I.S. brigands, it needs to frame the laws and activities in terms of their civil actions, without respect to any religious motivations or professed religious claims.

Comment What happens if you EAT this salad? (Score 1) 39

Does it get broken down into something harmless in the stomach? Or do YOU get conductive lines along YOUR plumbing?

It's not a minor thing: For starters the heartbeat propagation is partly electrical. Better-than-blood-plasma conductors laid out along the plumbing of the heart might affect the heartbeat in a dangerous manner.

Comment Conspiracy theories and the "Second Cover" (Score 1) 42

... there's always room for a conspiracy theory like the NWO controlling both the US and German governments and then some to suppress the truth.

The problem is that people do tend to work together to advance their own interests, and do so in secret to reduce opposition from others. That is the definition of conspiracy. Such activity is not purely mythical or rare - it's pervasive, inherent to the human condition.

Governments, and groups within and/or associated with them, have a long track record of doing such things, getting away with them for years, and having (some of) them come to light decades later. It's always the same story: "Oh, yes, back in the bad old days there were such things going on. But that stuff isn't done any more. (And anybody who claims such stuff is happening now is a nutcase, so pay no attention to him.)"

Then, maybe 30 or 40 years later what was going on THIS time comes to light, and the story repeats. Or somebody blows the whistle while it's still going on and presents evidence (often at great cost to himself), and then it's "That's just a rogue person/agency/group. We're bringing them to heel." or "It's a corrupt administration. Replace the head of state with a different one (maybe from the other major party but keep the same two parties in power) and it's all taken care of." Yeah, right.

Snowden revelations, ECHELON, Watergate, COINTELPRO, Pentagon Papers, Hanford Experiment, Tuskegee Experiment, Factor 8, Abscam, Ng Lap Seng, Iran-Contra, MK-Ultra, Operations MOCKINGBIRD, PHOENIX, and CHAOS, ... I could go on for pages, and that's just big, US (sometimes with allies), stuff that came to light in MY lifetime.

The government has whole agencies tasked with conspiring in secret to collect information and/or intervene to interfere with any opposition to its interests. The US has "Black Budgets" to unauditably fund such activity, and the Department of Defense, alone, spends an estimated $50 BILLION a year on its portion of this (as of 2009).

With their activities occurring in secret, there is much temptation to, and limited checks on, also targeting the biggest risk to the people currently in power in any government: The citizens of the country.

"Spook" agencies have a number of techniques to keep these conspiracies hidden, and one that has come to light (and is appropos) is the "Second Cover". This consists of spreading TWO cover stories: The first is plausible. The second is tinfoil-hat fruitcake material, lightly hidden. Anybody who figures out the first cover IS a cover and starts digging finds the second cover. Then they usually either give up (rather than dig for a third level) or you get new material for the tabloids, and another boost for the "conspiracy theories are ALL crazy talk" meme. (And it also helps that occasionally they DO try out the odd piece of mystic bulls**t, just to see if any of it, like some herbal medicine, DOES work.)

I generally assume (as did The Framers) that this sort of creeping (or galloping) encroachment is inherent in governments, is going on (and having new project starts) all the time, we usually can't tell, through the fog of misdirection, what's going on NOW, and the job of the people, like a farmer clearing weeds and trimming orchard trees, is to continually cut it back to levels that don't ruin our own lives and livelihoods.

Comment I wish they'd ditch daylight savings time. (Score 2) 143

Do you have any IDEA what a mess Daylight Savings Time makes of things like programs for process control and scheduling - and has at least since I did software for it back in the late '70s

Heck: For far longer than that. I hear the railroads handle it like this:
  - In the spring, suddenly all the trains are an hour late. They work their way back to being on-time as they normally would - by running as fast as is practical.
  - In the fall they STOP FOR AN HOUR. They just sit there with their engines running...
It's just easier than trying to figure out something "better" to do about it.

The claims that it saves energy are currently backward and getting more so. They may always have been, or it may be because lighting is more efficient (so the savings is small) while air conditioners are far more prevalent (and run more if people get home earlier).

Meanwhile it increases death rates: From DST-lagged drivers just after a change, from kids getting hit going to school in the dark on more days, from stress-related diseases exacerbated by the stress of the time change.

It also was a big factor in killing drive-in theatres.

If the government MUST twiddle with the clocks seasonally they should set them the OTHER WAY, creating Night Life Savings Time. We ALREADY have a shortage of dark time for evening recreation in the summer. Why take another hour away by shifting the clocks? Add one instead.

Comment Re:Children or not (Score 1) 200

Since there are no longer criminal penalties all of those pesky constitutional guarantees fall to the wayside.

Except for the one that says we're not supposed to deprived of property without due process... that applies whether it's "civil" or not. And of course, if the fine's over $20 you could ask for a jury trial. Gee, maybe the founders were on to something there... oh yeah, they tried to pull crap like this back in the 18th century too.

All power corrupts, but we need electricity.