The judges are part of the game, flaws and all. The whole thing is, or should be imo, a human endeavor. everyone doing their best but accept the occasional error

Even if there is great prestige and wealth involved, doesn't the sign above the players entrance say something about victory being an imposter ?

It probably helps that Guy Fawkes day is in November, not peak fire season.

The civil servants' parents have a right to prevent their offspring being exposed to reality

It looked like the Father Ted all priests over-75s game

now we'll see if it has the intended outcome without having to try it out for ourselves

I think the idea is to pay american citizens more but to devalue the dollar vs other currencies so that in fact we're paid less than the immigrants would have been paid in big macs, gold, or other global standards.

I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy... so that their children can study painting, poetry and music

Now that we know this, how can we use it to benefit people. There must be decision support systems that can be targetted to assist people with the more mundane future likelyhoods. For example to support decisions on borrowing money to buy a house or a car.

can't iron dust do the same thing ?

is it cheaper than 100G Ethernet ? If so, can I run IP over it ?

How are they going to identify all the American contributions to Linux and strip them out to achieve their aims ?

There's only one thing worse than blaming the customers, it's blaming the former customers.

I blame uinicode for getting rid of the two-character winking emoji (and for making it two bytes longer)

:(

I'm guessing this is much cheaper than cleaning up the rivers and restoring the land. At least it sounds environmental and creates some jobs.

considering almost everyone "uses" AI every time they do a google search I suspect the responses varied depending on the interviewee's impresion of what "using AI" means