Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Artificial Scarcity Enforcement. Yay. (Score 1) 365

by brianary (#35811234) Attached to: <em>Garry's Mod</em> Catches Pirates the Fun Way
As long as Steam doesn't enact a policy of disabling accounts based on reputation or accusations by other entities, such as the forum mentioned, that's good. However, I'm not sure we can rule that out. And Steam can be capricious: http://consumerist.com/2011/03/valve-disables-steam-account-wont-explain-why.html

Comment: Re:This narrow, breathless hitpiece... (Score 1) 338

by brianary (#33587818) Attached to: Google Engineer Spied On Teen Users
No argument about the prurient attraction of the piece. I do object to Google being singled out as if they were the only organization with the problem. As if all corporations, government agencies, and NGOs didn't have similar problems. I'd be a bit more worried about who is running the airport T-ray scanners, e.g.

Comment: So how does one qualify? (Score 3, Interesting) 255

by brianary (#33567194) Attached to: Microsoft To Issue Blanket License To NGOs

Which organizations? How will Microsoft define "journalist"? Will bloggers qualify? Does the journalist, the publication, and/or the group need to be outside the US?

Will they get a license key and support?

"Whatever the circumstances of the particular cases the New York Times described, we want to be clear that we unequivocally abhor any attempt to leverage intellectual property rights to stifle political advocacy or pursue improper personal gain."

So very naive. Do they think they are getting IP enforcement externalities for free?

Comment: They'll include the pics (Score 2, Insightful) 635

by brianary (#28696535) Attached to: Wikipedia Debates Rorschach Censorship
The Wikipedia intelligentsia won't even carry spoiler alerts, because that could lead to "censorship", and is somehow "hard to define" (seems like the word "reveal" would be the main tip to me, in the same way as "like" or "as" denotes similes). But then again, they were able to censor the journalist kidnapping stuff, since the ends justify the means. So, who knows?

Somebody's terminal is dropping bits. I found a pile of them over in the corner.

Working...