Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:No. Just better mileage (Score 1) 136

You aren't factoring in all the other maintenance a fossil needs too. Brakes, fluids, belts, gearbox, exhaust, filters, all sorts of crap.

EVs and hybrids shoudln't have significantly different brake wear. Factored in oil changes, which includes the oil filter. I've never needed to add any other fluids in any car I've owned other than wiper fluid, which an EV also requires. I guess I left out the air filter, but that's such a tiny maintenance cost compared with the other stuff that it almost isn't even worth mentioning.

Belts and transmission do wear out eventually, but that's not an issue unless your car is outside of its warranty period, and an out-of-warranty EV can also have things go wrong. The only straightforward comparison is between two in-warranty cars, because it's impossible to predict the costs for an older vehicle reliably. It might go 300k miles or it might blow a head gasket 10 miles out of warranty.

Comment Re:No. Just better mileage (Score 1) 136

Add to that an oil change for $100 every 5,000 miles on oil changes

Every... 5,000... miles? Are you out of your mind? Cars didn't need oil changes that frequently even back when they used unleaded gasoline. How far are you willing to go to lie for the petroleum industry?

An oil change for $100? Are you out of your mind? Where are you getting your car serviced?

Jiffy Lube in the Bay Area. And while cars are under warranty, if you don't do an oil change at the recommended interval, it can negatively impact your ability to get engine problems covered under the warranty, so most people do so.

Comment Re:No. Just better mileage (Score 1) 136

That is all true except PG&E's EV2 plan has off-peak energy at 28.5 cents per kWh, which should cover most of the needs of people who charge at home. That rate makes it competitive with the Prius, even before you consider oil changes.

Of course, they also charge you more for your heat and air during the day. With a whole-home time-of-use plan, they're likely to get their money either way.

I'm pretty sure the only way you're not going to get screwed with your pants on is to have a separate meter on an EV-B rate plan. Totally worth $1.50 a month. Too bad I'm not currently eligible because of where I live (because PG&E doesn't own the meters). Then again, I have unlimited supercharging, so I guess I probably wouldn't use it anyway. :-)

Comment Re:No. Just better mileage (Score 1) 136

Well, if you can charge from solar the equation changes significantly-- closer to $0.09/kWh or $0.02/mile.

Sure, but only if you also have a Powerwall or similar. Otherwise, your car is going to be at work during the day, rather than charging at home, and you're going to be getting jack s**t for your excess solar during the day thanks to PG&E's rate structure, and then buying that power back at night at full price.

Comment Re:No. Just better mileage (Score 1) 136

PG&E residential service averages 45.33 cents average per kWh.

That's crazy? California has huge amounts of solar generation, but no cheap mid-day tariffs ?

PG&E nearly went bankrupt with lawsuits over their mishandling of gas pipe maintenance (San Bruno explosion) and high tension line maintenance (multiple wildfires). If they can't make a profit from cutting corners on maintenance, their only choice is to make a profit with extortionate rate hikes. /s

In all seriousness, the biggest mistake multiple California governors have made was not letting PG&E go bankrupt, buying up the assets, and starting over with a state-owned not-for-profit power company. For-profit essential utilities are like for-profit medicine: you pay more for less. Competition never really works when you have a natural monopoly like essential utilities or when comparison shopping is impractical, such as emergency medical care. That's why certain essential services are generally better off socialized. And anybody arguing otherwise doesn't have a solid grasp of economics.

Comment Re:No. Just better mileage (Score 2) 136

If you cannot charge at home, their cost per mile goes up to the same as a gas car's or more.

In California, even if you can charge at home, the cost per mile is more than many gasoline-powered cars:

Model 3: 3.7 to 4.2 miles per kWh. PG&E residential service averages 45.33 cents average per kWh. That's 10.79 to 12.25 cents per mile.

My usual gas station is $3.90 per gallon. A Prius hybrid gets 56 miles per gallon. That's 6.9 cents per mile. Add to that an oil change for $100 every 5,000 miles on oil changes, which is 2 cents per mile, and the Prius hybrid is still 2 to 4 cents per mile cheaper than the Model 3.

The only way you save money per mile with an EV in California is if you have free unlimited supercharging or free workplace charging. And even then, somebody is paying for your charging, just not you.

Comment Re:Just take some ivermectin (Score 1) 62

Or maybe some colloidal silver. It's certainly okay that we have cut billions of dollars to funding scientific research because there's nothing homeopathy can't cure right?

Colloidal silver is almost certainly useless when taken orally, but don't knock silver in general. It is used in wound dressings for a reason. Candida auris is one of those reasons. From the article:

The antifungal susceptibility testing of silver nanoparticles under planktonic conditions of C. auris isolates showed significant antimicrobial activity against all C. auris isolates, the MIC of AgNPs was <6.25 g/mL, and the MFC was 12.5 g/mL for all isolates, except one isolate was 6.25 g/mL.

Comment Re:This is NOT NORMAL (Score 1) 204

Every country has a population that might be valuable if living under a democratic system, as in people that work, get money and buy american products and the smarter ones get "brain drained" to america.

You don't have to take over a country to get that. The U.S. brain drains countries that aren't democratic just fine. There are a few that we arbitrarily choose not to brain drain or sell to (currently Cuba, Iran, and North Korea, I think), but very few countries are on that list. And Cuba was one of the countries that I was thinking of as a country that has nothing worth taking over, because if it did, then those gains combined with eliminating the risks associated with having a country like that so close to our borders would probably have been enough to tempt someone to overthrow its government long ago.

Then again, Republican war hawks have started thumping their chests about Cuba now, so who knows. It might still happen.

Slashdot Top Deals

Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence. -- Dijkstra

Working...