Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: break them all down; in reverse! (Score 2, Insightful) 9

by atheists (#9261086) Attached to: Poll (inspired by Em)
D. Whichever lobbyist group pays them the most.

No, definately not. If so there is no point in having people elected, just let the companies pay for their views.

C. According to how they perceive their constituants would vote were they allowed.

Not directly, no. If this was the case then each issue should be voted on by the people themselves directly. Again, no need for the government except as a tabulation system.

B. According to their party affiliation's beliefs.

How did that differ from D?

A. According to their conscience/beliefs.

Bingo. People are elected to represent their people. While we know that we won't always agree all the time, the goal is to pick someone who will reason about something in a way similar to you. If you vote for someone sharing similar consience/beleifs (or at least one with amicable beleifs) then you'll do just fine.

To downgrade the human mind is bad theology. - C. K. Chesterton