You'd think a branch of "don't be evil" would be working to reduce that.
They're actually a branch of "Do the Right Thing."
and the "JPG not RAW" is just for workflow-related reasons.
But it's not "JPG not RAW," it's "originally JPG." If it's workflow-related, and the input to Reuters needs to be JPG, why would they care whether the JPG conversion took place in the camera or in off-camera RAW-to-JPG software?
Mess with football betting, and the Democrats will finally be put out to pasture.
No one said that you can't bet on football in New York. You just need lay your bets with friends, colleagues or your local bookie.
that would require logging off of facebook
Unless you can come up with Facebook content that people want.
Comcast must contact all 590,000 people
"Can I please place you on hold? Thank you, I am now transferring you to the department that handles this function."
"Hello, and welcome to Comcast customer service. We are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes, but be assured that your call will be handled as soon as a customer service agent is available. Please hold."
"Have you heard about Comcast Xfinity bundles? Comcast Xfinity bundles offer customers the opportunity to right-size their services!"
Why the ego? Just say "research scientist".
Because "Research Scientist" and "Senior Research Scientist" (like, "Director" and "Senior Director" or "Vice President" and "Senior Vice President") are distinct job grades.
This exploit would allow [the NSA and CIA] to get around any security measures and get into the target’s iPhone to intercept calls, messages, and access data stored in the phone.
The NSA and CIA are going to circumvent technological measures in contravention of the DMCA? Does the FBI know about this?
What spy features?
Cyanide cigarette, tape recorder camera, dagger shoe, garrote watch, underwater jet pack, oil slick tail pipe.
Most bachelors curriculum include a lot of extraneous requirements and electives having little or nothing to do with the job.
They can make you more interesting (or at least tolerable) as a co-worker.
Although the technology is patented, the source code itself is not disclosed by any patent and cannot be derived from any publicly disclosed source.
If the patent doesn't disclose the invention in sufficient detail for it to be reproduced by someone skilled in the arts, is the patent valid?
Anything cut to length will be too short.