Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Comment: Not that surprising thanks to CALEA (Score 1) 74

by Xipher (#48601329) Attached to: Govt Docs Reveal Canadian Telcos Promise Surveillance Ready Networks

Since the US has required access network operators to implement CALEA support many products are already being designed with lawful intercept functionality anyways. Implementing it isn't a problem really, just so long as it's not abused it's not that different from a telephone wiretap.

Comment: Re:Yes it is a peering problem ... (Score 1) 243

by Xipher (#48274111) Attached to: First Detailed Data Analysis Shows Exactly How Comcast Jammed Netflix

Eyeball networks didn't usually get settlement free peering to begin with. Until you had these huge eyeballs form like Comcast that kind of peering was between the transit ISPs themselves. Comcast used to be a customer of these ISPs, and didn't get the peering agreements until they started congesting links by dropping transit services. I found information on this discussed on the NANOG mailing list from 2010, so this has been going on for a number of years already.

Comment: Re:Why can't (Score 1) 349

by Xipher (#47370095) Attached to: Bug In Fire TV Screensaver Tears Through 250 GB Data Cap

Electricity, water, and natural gas all "consume" physical product. Bits on a wire don't actually consume anything, other than the electricity used to put them there but thats mostly constant. Bandwidth is a time limited function, not product limited. "Unused" bandwidth on a link is just wasted time with no useful data traversing the wire.

"If you want to eat hippopatomus, you've got to pay the freight." -- attributed to an IBM guy, about why IBM software uses so much memory