"Ugly is in the eye of the beholder."
Well, a lot of beholders found it ugly. When one of the most common types of reaction videos is "Here's how I would fix the unappealing character designs and color palettes," you've got a problem. Didn't help that it cost money when the competition was FTP.
It was worse. It was a mediocre game that was *really* ugly and was going up against entrenched competition that outclassed it six ways from Sunday.
You too can be a tool!
"reductions in the price of groceries!"
Someday I 'd like to see your alternate reality for myself.
"What does Trump talking about sending tariff money to citizens say about the rise of basic-income-type policies?"
It says that Trump will spin self-serving lies without end to get what he wants. But we already knew that.
It's never going to happen. The money is not there, and Trump would never do it anyway.
No. ChatGPT parrots language without understanding it. That is not using language. "Using" something implies achieving a purpose by means of that thing, and ChatGPT has no purpose of its own.
...seems to be about four years late.
"Grand Theft Auto Forever"
"The Three Mouseketeers"
"They speak a form of english that has been manipulated by marketing people to such a degree that it's often difficult to see the reality behind those words."
In other words, Newspeak.
We can defeat the giant enemy crabs by hitting their weak points for massive damage.
I don't even know *how* to drive a stick!
"Prior art" is only a factor in patents. This ain't a patent.
The day will come that an AI will learn something that we did not deliberately teach it. When an AI is able to improve its own code, it won't be bound by the limitations of its human creator. It's only a question of when.
LK
Can a non-biological entity feel desire? Can it want to grow and become something more than what it is? I think that's a philosophical question and not a technological one.
LK
Don't agree at all and I think that's a morally dangerous approach. We're looking for a scientific definition of "desire" and "want". That's almost certainly a part of "conscious" and "self aware". Philosophy can help, but in the end, to know whether you are right or not you need the experimental results.
Experiments can be crafted in such a way as to exclude certain human beings from consciousness.
One day, it's extremely likely that a machine will say to us "I am alive. I am awake. I want..." and whether or not it's true is going to be increasingly hard to determine.
LK
"It ain't over until it's over." -- Casey Stengel
