By pumping out 20+ kids, starting as soon as they're of the legal age of the U.S. to have sex. With some rarely prosecuted cases of them forcing under age girls to start, after being put in an arranged marriage.

Then Draconian, with a capital D, disciplining and out right preventing exposure to anything else till their worldview is installed through Pavlov conditioning. I.E. install pstd levels of fear for even minor infractions of their religious views.

Doesn't matter that 15 out of the 20 flee between the early teenage years to 18 years of age. Bringing with them horror stories of beating even toddlers within an inch of their lives for simple infractions like talking when not spoken to, or saying no to their parents. I'm not talking about how people now overreact to a simple spanking. I'm talking being beaten black and blue till near broken bone levels of disciplining. Or the previously mentioned underage sex.

Their worldview and belief survive by stretching the absolute right of religious freedom of and from worship, to it's absolute limit by claiming this treatment is part of their flavor of religion. While i hate how they treat their kids and adults. Especially since they no longer 'need' to pump out 20+ kids because 15-18 will die from disease and accident, though they do have the right to choose this if they want. I am 'very' hesitant to even consider the concept of pulling the protection of that absolute right for fear of its emotionally charged and justified righteous fury against this treatment. Be it used by others to justify the removal of the right for lesser perceived infractions. Like Catholic vs Protestant, or more likely Christianity vs 'any' other religion and lack their of.

That there was a file system. AND A caching system with more or less the same name. Bcache and Bcachefs
The former being a way to semi speed up raid array's with a cache ssd.

No, surnames did not come from the religion, in Europe specificity it became necessary as the population boomed with the economy after the black death killed off the static social class system. Especially since families of lower classes could grow without the explicit approval of the land's nobility like the local Barron.
Before that, you were 'john of 'town's name''. Later that became 'John the 'smith'' because there were more than one John in the settlement and not all of them had the same profession. Not long after, smith just became a name and not a moniker of the person's profession they were born into.
Especially since not to long after this became necessary, the old 'everyone in your family worked in a smithy, so you can only work in one too'. Went away and the current idea of a person can choose and change what they worked as came about.

As for the Japanese side of things, any casual research from non western sources shows the opposite. The overwhelming majority of the public did not like this. They viewed it as western culture warriors 'trying' to imprint their ideals(specifically feminists) over Japanese culture and traditions. Marriages are considered a union if two families, not a separation of the children from their parents. The two partners are considered equal and in no way do the women feel 'oppressed' they can't keep their maiden name.

Don't worry, SystemD will copy it just like it copied the idea of svhost.exe of the pre-win10 days when it was a giant blob of minor process. And even if a minor one crashed, bluescreen. It's windows lite.

Don't mandate it, all you do then is put the price of homes just that bit more further out of the reach of normal people who actually work and buy things and aren't given them by tax payer money.

At which point it becomes no different than other currencies and commodities.

In fact it would lose the only thing it has different.

It's no anonymous, in fact it's quite vulnerable to the 'nearest neighbor' method that makes cash traceable. Especially with every person 'on' the system having a complete from day one transaction ledger.

It takes too long even at the start to do a transaction, making it a forgone conclusion the seller will always lose money. That's why every business which initially adopted it car makers to new-egg, dropped it.

And it's fluctuations make the stock market look stable.

The same thing applies to any other crypto too.

Everyone is ignoring the elephant in the room that would've killed bitcoin and crypto in general.

->Nothing gets deleted from the blockchain-

Means as time goes on, more transactions are made, more people use it. The LESS people can host the blockchain. This will happen when it goes from tens to 100's of gigabytes to over a terabyte. With less people on the network due to this. the longer it will take to clear transactions. Which are already too long for 'any' reasonable form of currency.

Oh sure it could still cling to life from dedicate users, but eventually the storage requirements would even outpace individuals.

Those and the chicken tariff(look it up). Were simply done to prevent cheaper, more efficient and better made trucks and light duty vehicles from japan, europe, and korea from doing to those markets in the united states that their sedans and hatchbacks did to the regular car market.

Wasn't about health, and the health claims are 'nearly' as dubious as those that claimed artificial sweeteners and dyes are dangerous. Because the media didn't tell people the studies were flawed. For example those two feed the weight equivalent to mice of a normal human chugging gallons of 'pure' sweetener a day for the former, and close to hourly for the latter. Hint, even water is unhealthy if you drink too much of it. Flushes out your electrolytes.

Being realistic.
You're not going to be able to stop the poor Indian or Chinese man from killing tigers to sell the parts to 'traditional medicine' practitioners. Not when it's either than or their family starves.
Same with any other place where humans either directly kills the 'endangered species' or does so indirectly because the only way they can put food on the table is to continue to do it, despite all the aid and help.

So that leaves only two realistic options, this, and fully deregulating pet ownership. Frankly, both should be done. Using this method to keep zoo's full, and the pet ownership to keep as many species alive as possible. Because as seen by the number of cows, chickens, house pets, horses etc. In the human geological era, the only way a species is to survive is either be useful as a resource, as a pet, or as entertainment, to humans.