Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Obligatory question (Score 5, Insightful) 640

by Surazal (#40219061) Attached to: South Korea Surrenders To Creationist Demands On Evolution Textbooks

Observational science doesn't disprove ideas about origins. Those ideas can't be tested scientifically. All that can be done really is to interpret the data in the context of your preferred presuppositional research framework. That's what materialistic scientists do... that's what scientists who believe in a young universe do.

Again, this is wrong. The "Young Universe" so-called theory can easily be tested scientifically, and every bit of data says that it's false. In fact, it is for that reason it should not even be called a theory since theories are supposed to have the benefit of empirical data to back them up.

Comment: Re:Obligatory question (Score 5, Insightful) 640

by Surazal (#40218869) Attached to: South Korea Surrenders To Creationist Demands On Evolution Textbooks

People familiar with evolution do not assume creationists are wrong. We know they are wrong based on observational science. Creation myth may be an interesting story to tell and an important part of our (or any other) culture, but for people to even take it seriously as fact is delusion held to the highest form of grandeur.

Comment: Re:Whatever happened to Perl 6? (Score 4, Informative) 192

by Surazal (#40069525) Attached to: Perl 5.16.0 Released

I love Perl, but I'm curious. Whatever happened to Perl 6? I remember hearing about it way back when I was in grad school, which was a long time ago.

Perl 6 isn't dead, per se. A quick google search shows that there are a few implementations running around, although none are even close to production-ready yet. Here's the Perl 6 portal, in case you were wondering.

I did run and download one of the more complete implementations, and part of the problem I think is that perl 6 is not ANYTHING like perl 5. The reason I use perl at all, and the only reason I still use perl 5 TO THIS DAY is the regex capabilities. They completely ripped that out of perl 6 and re-implemented it to make it more user-friendly, and they did so poorly, IMHO. Instead of calling htis perl 6, they should have named it something completely different. Call it "perl" does a disservice to what made perl so powerful in the first place.

Kitchen activity is highlighted. Butter up a friend.

Working...