Technofeudalism is the end goal for the tech billionaire class. Own the workers and even own the customers (now called users). Most of them think that they are doing us a favor by insisting on "hustle culture" and turning everything into a type of rental service.

Subsidizing things that are for the general benefit to all makes a lot of sense. Especially for infrastructure that enhances business, commerce, and national security.

Nuclear is not coming online in the US. Your choices now are: Renewables or frequent regional outages. Given the state of our infrastructure, I think a mix of both is in the future.

The USA has 21 proposed reactors. 0 under construction, 0 planned. It is unlikely any of the proposed projects could go online before the mid- to late 2030's.

It's obvious to you and to me that nuclear is the most capable and scalable and should be our primary choice moving forward.
Nuclear fission as an energy source is a dead end in America, and that has little to do with nuclear hysteria and more to do with infrastructure funding, NIMBY, and wealth inequality. (our bad politics are why we cannot have nice things)

But the reality is that we (the US) won't be taking the best option. So it's time to discuss secondary and tertiary options.

I keep my DNA locked in my gun cabinet.

For vaping it's 16 years old.

I'm not aware of tobacco smoking beating that, but there have been a lot of smokers over the centuries so it seems possible, the internet is just bad at searching for information older than a few years.

The closer to zero that market cap is, the more correct the valuation.

It prepares the youth for capitalism

Nobody outside of the EU wants Starlink anymore since Elon threatened Ukraine to remove their Starlink access unless they sucked Trump's dick.

Now it's clear that Elon is willing to weaponize everyone's access to Starlink to serve his own petty interests. Since then several projects were started all around the world to build competing networks.

Good job Elon at sinking your own company (once again).

Your recommendation would then be to stop all other companies and give Elon the pure monopoly ?

Other than that, I'm not sure what your point it.

No you weren't. You wrote:

I voted for Giant Meteor in 2024.

If you were bored, you'd light up a cigarette. Obviously not for children, but for 14+ it was how many of us coped with the lack of an immediately rewarding stimulus in the analog world.

Yes, there are hundreds of different climate models. An abundance of models is not evidence that there is no such thing as climate change.

The value of a model is in its predictive power. If a model can bound historical data then the next logical step is finding the bounds of future data. All models have a greater spread the future they look into the future, because that's just math as you stack on tolerances over a greater time. You add up the error when you're looking at the extremes, but you also find a higher probability somewhere in the middle if your model is any good.

So assuming climate change is going to happen to some degree. What actions should we take to prepare for it?

Once you have a workflow with multiple toolchains, you're on your way to porting to any number of architectures. And automated testing of architecture independence in a codebase becomes practical. That's certainly how it worked out at my company. Once we started building for Sparc and PowerPC, it made other architectures easier to add a decade later. And we had the additional complication that a big chunk of the codebase is drivers. Getting ARM systems with the right hardware into the test automation pool was a big non-technical challenge. What manager wants to sign the PO to pay for duplicating all the x86 configurations with ARM? ;-)

Replacing assembler with compiler intrinsics helped simplify porting SIMD code between architectures. But in some cases we will just have to add a bunch of tiny macros or functions in assembler in order to do something like RV32 vs RV64 in the future. Not a big deal for us when a customer is paying for the work.

I like Krita. That's a desktop app in the open source world that I think is really enjoyable and well-designed, and comparable to some of the best commercial Windows apps.

Plus the usual suspects are available on all the major OSes, including OpenBSD: Chrome, Firefox, Signal, Discord, Slack, Telegram, DOSbox, etc. But sadly no Wine or Proton on OBSD. Linux wins when it comes to playing Steam or wine, but if you're going to be running a bunch of closed source games on a machine then probably best to use a dedicated machine that doesn't contain anything important on it (other than your Steam library).