Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Or... (Score 1, Troll) 145

And it's absolutely not a process ripe for abuse by a malcontent handing the President of the United States something for executive signature, that the President of the United States doesn't even look at or read - he just accepts at face value that his aide would never lie and signs it.

TL;DR: what's the difference between an "autopen" and an old asshole so far into cognitive decline that he just signs anything put in front of him?

Comment Re:Or... (Score 1) 145

For that to be even remotely true, all of the following would also have to be true, which immediately disproves your hypothesis by observing easily seen reality:

1. somehow the public at-large became "informed" in the recent past with ever-diminishing quality of signal coming from reputable news sources, because "reputable" news sources are too busy chasing outrage for dollars

2. somehow the public at-large has completely disconnected from the propaganda networks such as Fox News, NewsMax, OAN, etc. that actively lie to their audience in order to get fact-based information from people that actually care about facts in their reporting, and nobody noticed.

3. government economic data was unreliable - you have not proven this central premise of your argument. You just threw it out there as if it's God's written gospel without warranting it with any evidence. Yes, there are corrections to past months, but there have ALWAYS been corrections to past reporting periods, and has been for decades. That is all factored in - you don't trust the absolute newest measurement period without padding the margin because it WILL be corrected.

4. government economic data is still unreliable - without proving it was unreliable to begin with, you cannot assert that it is still unreliable. There is an argument to be made that it is being highly politicized through the firing of bureau chiefs for presenting unfavorable data, but without disproving the data you're pissing in the wind on that too.

Economists the world over have always held that the data coming from the Bureau of Labor Statistics is the gold standard in economic reporting, emulated by national governments across the globe. I think I'm more likely to believe the career experts - some with Nobel prizes in economics - over "hsthompson69" on a little-known internet backwater like Slashdot who can't even bother to back up their asserted opinions with anything based in fact.

Comment Re:Adapter (Score 1) 234

How much shit are you taking with you to a meeting?

You're not living there, you're discussing things with people and taking some notes. Maybe presenting something on a shared screen with the equipment already in the room.

Why do you need 3+ USB ports for that, assuming any wireless technology is in use whatsoever?

Stop bringing half your god damn desk to a 30 minute meeting.

Comment Re:$400M for AOL (Score 1) 28

Let's face it - if you're spending $1.5B for AOL, you're paying $1.5B for a list of email addresses owned by people too thick to figure out how to create a different email account somewhere else.

That's a captive audience that you can spam the shit out of forever... or at least until they keel over from old age; better consult with the actuarials on what single-digit number of years the mean is for that customer base because you know they're all old AF.

Comment I have a better idea. (Score 3, Insightful) 47

I'll just ignore your non-performant software until it's either fixed, or hardware advances sufficiently to make it work as expected.

In the meantime, he won't see a cent of my money, and by the time either of those two conditions are met, it will be at a discount anyway because it will be months / years old.

Fuck that guy. Instead of calling your customers names and bitching about their totally legitimate performance complaints, try making software that meets customer expectations. It's like these people learned nothing from the Cyberpunk fiasco.

Comment Re:Adapter (Score 1) 234

nor have I seen a USB-C headset.

Then you aren't looking very hard. Any set of headphones that supports being a headset for calls which has a USB-C connector on it quite possibly has a USB-C DAC in it as well if it isn't a completely cheap piece of shit. I had some Sennheiser cans from like 4 years ago that did that, so it's not like it's a brand new thing.

Oh look those wireless headphones just turned into wired headphones by you plugging a C-to-C cable into them, without having to bitch and moan about an analog 3.5mm TRS plug. How about that?

Comment Re:Adapter (Score 2) 234

So he wants to buy a device with insufficient connectivity for the intended usage, so he can bitch about the insufficient connectivity.

And then when someone points out a cheap and very available solution to the insufficient connectivity problem of the device, he wants to bitch about having to adapt the chosen insufficient device to be sufficient through adding a cheap and very available solution that has existed for about 3 decades.

Sounds like they just want to bitch, which means there is no new problem to solve here. Pick equipment that is sufficient to the required task, and you don't have a problem to begin with.

Comment Re:Adapter (Score 1) 234

Or you could embrace some modern thinking and get a cable or two that have magnetic attachments on the end that become whatever USB cable you need it to be.

I love how people bitch and cry about wireless peripherals, and then also bitch and cry that they might have to bring a few cables around with them if they insist on wired peripherals.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain." -- The Wizard Of Oz

Working...